Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rajendra SahversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The Court permitted the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioner Rajendra Sah filed an anticipatory bail application in the High Court of Patna. During the pendency of the application, he was arrested. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Court, after hearing counsel for both sides, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application can be withdrawn after the petitioner has been arrested

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22148 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-36 Year-2026 Thana- SRINAGAR District- West Champaran
                  ======================================================
                  Rajendra Sah Son of Late Jalebi Sah Resident of Village- Malahi Tola, Ward
                  No. 02, P.S.- Bairiya, District- West Champaran

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Sharad Kumar Verma
                  For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Parmanand Kumar
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    07-04-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks

                    permission to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application

                    as petitioner, during pendency of the same, was arrested.

                                 3. Permission is accorded.

                                 4. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as

                    withdrawn.


                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.