Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Vivek RanjanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the modification application and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

Vivek Ranjan filed a modification application in Criminal Miscellaneous No.22483 of 2026 arising from a 2024 police case. The petitioner, through counsel, later sought to withdraw the application, requesting liberty to avail appropriate relief in accordance with law. The State of Bihar opposed the withdrawal. The Hon'ble Justice Purnendu Singh considered the petitioner's request and granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the modification application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate procedure for a petitioner to withdraw a pending modification application in a criminal miscellaneous proceeding?

Subjects

  • withdrawal of application
  • modification application
  • criminal miscellaneous procedure
  • procedural law
  • court order

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22483 of 2026
                                              In
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91239 of 2025
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-337 Year-2024 Thana- RAMPUR District- Gaya
                 ======================================================
                 Vivek Ranjan S/O Sri Manindra Kumar Singh R/O Bank of India Colony,
                 Indrapuri, Ashiyana, P.O.- B.V. College, Patna- 800014.
                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Rajan Ghoshrave, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Rajendra Nath Jha, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   10-04-2026                       Heard Mr. Rajan Ghoshrave, learned counsel

                   appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Rajendra Nath Jha,

                   learned APP for the State.

                                2. After some argument, learned counsel appearing on

                   behalf of the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present

                   modification application with a liberty to avail appropriate

                   liberty in accordance with law.

                                4. Permission accorded.

                                5. In view of the above submissions, the present

                   modification application filed on behalf of the petitioner is

                   dismissed as withdrawn.


                                                   (Purnendu Singh, J)
chn/-
U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.