Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kapil YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court held that the verification condition is unnecessary for a simple injury and therefore modified it to allow acceptance of bail bonds, and also extended the surrender period by two weeks.

Summary

The petitioners sought modification of the anticipatory bail order dated 04.02.2026, specifically to remove the condition requiring verification of an injury report before accepting bail bonds. They argued that the injury to the informant was simple and no injury report was on record, a point not contested by the State. The High Court examined the injury report, found the injury to be simple in nature, and concluded that the verification condition was unnecessary. Consequently, the Court modified condition (v) to direct the trial court to accept the bail bonds. Additionally, the Court extended the surrender period by two weeks in the interest of justice. The modification application was disposed, with the rest of the original order left unchanged.

Issues considered

  • Whether the condition requiring verification of the injury report before accepting anticipatory bail bonds should be modified given the injury is simple.
  • Whether the period for surrender can be extended in the present case.

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • modification of order
  • injury report
  • surrender period
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22490 of 2026
                                              In
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6730 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-11 Year-2021 Thana- NIMCHAKBATHANI District- Gaya
                 ======================================================
           1.     Kapil Yadav S/O Late Baburam Yadav R/O Village- Neemchak Bathani,
                  P.S.- Neemchak Bathani, Dist.- Gaya
           2.    Aditya Kumar S/O Vinod Prasad @ Binod Yadav R/O Village- Neemchak
                 Bathani, P.S.- Neemchak Bathani, Dist.- Gaya

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   03-04-2026                      This case has been listed under the heading ‘To Be

                   Mentioned’ at the instance of learned counsel for the petitioners.

                                    2. The present application has been filed for

                   modification of the order dated 04.02.2026 passed in Cr. Misc.

                   No. 6730 of 2026, to the extent of extending the period for

                   surrender. It is further submitted that, during the course of

                   hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner had asserted that no

                   injury had been caused to the informant. Since there was no

                   reference to any injury report in the impugned order, the

                   submission regarding there being no injury was made, which

                   was also not denied by the learned APP for the State during the

                   course of hearing. In that background, while granting
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22490 of 2026(3) dt.03-04-2026
                                            2/3




          anticipatory bail to the petitioner(s), this Court imposed

          condition no. (v), directing the learned trial court to verify from

          the records the correctness of the injury report before accepting

          the bail bonds. However, upon such verification, it has been

          found that the injury is simple in nature.

                           3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further

          submits that, as per the injury report of the injured persons, the

          nature of injury has been found to be simple, caused by hard

          and blunt substance. It is further submitted that the learned trial

          court, after calling for a report regarding the injury, has

          acknowledged the same; however, despite such finding, the

          court below has refused to accept the bail bonds as directed by

          this Court.

                           4. In view of the submissions made on behalf of

          the petitioner and considering that the injury is simple in nature,

          this Court is inclined to modify the condition no.(v) order dated

          04.02.2026.

                           5. Accordingly, condition no. (v) of the order dated

          04.02.2026, which required verification of the injury report

          prior to acceptance of bail bonds, stands modified to the extent

          that the learned court below is now directed to accept the bail

          bonds of the petitioners.
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22490 of 2026(3) dt.03-04-2026
                                                           3/3




                                          6. Further, on the grounds mentioned in the

                         modification application and in the interest of justice, the period

                         to surrender is extended two weeks from today in connection

                         with Neemchak Bathani P.S. Case No.11 of 2021, pending in

                         the court of learned A.C.J.M.-X, Gaya.

                                          7. The order dated 04.02.2026 is modified to the

                         extent as indicated above. The rest of the order shall remain

                         unaltered.

                                          8. Accordingly, this modification application

                         stands disposed of.



                                                                   (Ajit Kumar, J)
shikha/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.