Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Saheb Yadav @ Saheb KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL REJECTED

Holding

Anticipatory bail was denied.

Summary

Petitioners Saheb Yadav and Anish Yadav filed an anticipatory bail application fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The FIR alleges that they, along with others, brutally assaulted an informant while committing robbery and stole Rs. 95,000 and a mobile phone. Both petitioners have two prior criminal antecedents. The court examined the seriousness of the alleged offences and the petitioners' criminal history. Considering the nature of the accusations and the antecedents, the court rejected the anticipatory bail plea. Consequently, the petition was dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners given the nature of the offences and their criminal antecedents

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • criminal antecedent
  • robbery
  • assault
  • FIR
  • high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2277 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-204 Year-2025 Thana- SUPPI District- Sitamarhi
                 ======================================================
           1.     Saheb Yadav @ Saheb Kumar S/o- Ajay Yadav @ Ajay Rai Village - Parsa,
                  P.S - Suppi , District - Sitamarhi
           2.    Anish Yadav @ Anish Kumar S/o- Surendra Yadav Village - Parsa, P.S -
                 Suppi , District - Sitamarhi

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Devendra Kumar
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mrs.Suman Kumari Singh
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   31-01-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   A.P.P for the State.

                                2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case,

                   registered for offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2),

                   109, 303(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.

                                3. Petitioners are named in the F.I.R. with specific

                   accusation that they along with other accused persons brutally

                   assaulted informant while committing robbery and also robbed

                   cash of Rs. 95,000/- and one mobile phone. Both petitioners

                   have got two criminal antecedent.

                                4. Considering the nature of accusation and criminal

                   antecedent, the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioners is
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2277 of 2026(2) dt.31-01-2026
                                                         2/2




                       rejected.



                                             (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
anay/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.