Patna High Court
Devkant RayversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
Provisional anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioner subject to bail bond, sureties and verification of his antecedent.
Summary
Devkant Ray was implicated in an excise case for the alleged recovery of 275.26 litres of liquor from a godown and two vehicles, although no liquor was found in his immediate possession and he was not arrested at the spot. He contended that he was unaware of the misuse of his vehicle by a co‑accused named Alok and that he has a clean criminal antecedent. The State opposed his request for anticipatory bail. The Court examined the lack of direct possession, the petitioner’s ownership of the vehicle, and his clean record, and decided to grant provisional anticipatory bail subject to a modest bail bond, two sureties, and verification of his antecedent. The order conditions that if any prior case is discovered, the bail will not be confirmed, but if the antecedent remains clean, the provisional bail will be confirmed forthwith.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail under the circumstances of the excise case
- Whether ownership of a vehicle used in the alleged offence makes the owner liable for bail considerations
- Whether a clean criminal antecedent is a prerequisite for granting anticipatory bail
Legislation cited
- Bihar Negotiable Securities Act (BNSS) — s. 482(2)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- excise law
- liquor seizure
- vehicle ownership
- clean antecedent
- bail conditions
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23132 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-280 Year-2026 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Patna
======================================================
Devkant Ray S/O Jai Lal Ray R/O Ward no. 3, Lakhanpur, Tal Desrai, Dist.-
Vaishali- 844504
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Amrit Abhijat
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Kanhiya Kishor
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 08-04-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case
registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a), 32
and 41(i) of the Bihar Excise Act.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of
recovery of 275.26 litres of liquor from a godown and two
different vehicles.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was
recovered from his conscious possession and he came to be
implicated based on the fact that he is owner of one of the
seized vehicles. It is next submitted that no prudent person
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23132 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026
2/3
would use his own vehicle for committing an occurrence and
thus would create evidence against himself and hence would get
implicated, it is further submitted that petitioner was completely
unaware that Alok would misuse the vehicle in the manner as
alleged, who was also apprehended from the spot along with
three named accused.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for
anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned
counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the
event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks
from today, be released on Provisional anticipatory bail on
furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with
two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the
learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in
connection with Patna Excise P.S. Case No. 280 of 2026, subject
to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the
BNSS.
7. It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court
shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the
event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case
then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the purposes of
seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his antecedent before this
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23132 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026
3/3
Court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be
confirmed, but after verification if it is found that petitioner is a
person with clean antecedent in that event the provisional
anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sumit/-
U T
Checking your session…