DINESH YADAV @ DINESH KUMAR YADAV @ CHHOTI YADAV @ DINESH KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23262 of 2026
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-187 Year-2025 Thana- BUXAR INDUSTRIAL District- Buxar
                 ======================================================
                 Dinesh Yadav @ Dinesh Kumar Yadav @ Chhoti Yadav @ Dinesh Kumar
                 S/O Late Surendra Yadav R/O Vill - Dalsagar, P.S.- Buxar Industrial, Distt.-
                 Buxar

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   08-05-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The instant application for anticipatory bail has

                   been filed         by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in

                   connection with Buxar Industrial P.S. Case No. 187 of 2025

                   instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 310(4),

                   310(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 25(1-b)a, 25(1-aa), 26

                   and 35 of the Arms Act.

                                3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that police

                   had information that certain miscreants have gathered at the

                   house of the petitioner for committing some offence. On this

                   input, police raided the house of the petitioner upon which

                   certain persons started fleeing away. Four persons were
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23262 of 2026(2) dt.08-05-2026
                                            2/3




          apprehended and from their possession, weapons were

          recovered.

                        4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner

          that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He

          also submits that from perusal of the seizure list, it will transpire

          that the recovery has been made from a lane before the house of

          the petitioner. Nothing has been recovered from the possession

          of the petitioner nor from his house and two persons namely,

          Sunil Poddar and Rajesh Kumar was apprehended from the

          house of the petitioner and from their possession, several

          articles used in manufacturing of illegal arms were recovered.

                        6. Though no firearms was recovered from the house

          of the petitioner, certain articles which are used in

          manufacturing of firearms were recovered from the house of the

          petitioner.

                        7. Learned APP has opposed the prayer for bail of the

          petitioner and submitted that petitioner is having two criminal

          antecedents.

                        8. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

          considering that various articles which are used manufacturing

          of illegal firearms were recovered from from the house of the

          petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23262 of 2026(2) dt.08-05-2026
                                                       3/3




                     the petitioner and, as such, his application for bail is rejected.

                                  8. However, the petitioner is directed to surrender

                     before the trial Court and pray for regular bail, the same shall be

                     considered by the trial Court without being prejudiced by this

                     order of rejection.


                                                    (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Sudhanshu/-

U      T