Patna High Court
Mukesh Chaudhary @ Mukesh Pasi @ Mukesh ChoudhariversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
The court held that provisional anticipatory bail may be granted subject to verification of the petitioner’s antecedent and compliance with conditions under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
Summary
The petitioner, Mukesh Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 7 litres of liquor from a hut. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, the liquor was not found in his possession, and the allegation arose solely from the testimony of a chowkidar. The State opposed the bail, contending that the seriousness of the offence warranted detention. The High Court, after considering the submissions, granted provisional anticipatory bail conditioned on a bail bond of Rs. 500 with two sureties and a further deposit of Rs. 1,500 with the Lawyers’ Association, subject to verification of the petitioner’s antecedent. The court stipulated that if any prior case is discovered, the bail would not be confirmed, but if the petitioner is found to have a clean record, the provisional bail would be confirmed forthwith.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail can be granted in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.
- Whether the petitioner’s lack of possession of the alleged liquor and his clean antecedent justify the grant of anticipatory bail.
- Whether conditions under Section 482(2) of the BNSS may be imposed on anticipatory bail.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Negotiable Securities Act (BNSS) — s. 482(2)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- Bihar Excise Act
- Section 30(a)
- Section 482(2)
- criminal antecedent
- provisional bail
- clean antecedent
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2367 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-420 Year-2025 Thana- BACHHWARA District- Begusarai
======================================================
Mukesh Chaudhary @ Mukesh Pasi @ Mukesh Choudhari S/o- Ramotar
Chaudhary R/O- Chakadillar Chakdilar, P.S.- Bachhwara, Dist- Begusarai
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shashank Shekhar
For the Opposite Party/s : Ms.Shaheen Begum
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 27-01-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case
registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the
Bihar Excise Act.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of
recovery of 7 litres of liquor from a hut.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was
recovered from his conscious possession and even the alleged
recovery is from a hut which does not belong to the petitioner
and he came to be implicated at the instance of Chowkidar but
then it is submitted that if the Chowkidar was aware about the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2367 of 2026(2) dt.27-01-2026
2/3
involvement of the petitioner in the occurrence, then why he did
not inform the police prior to institution of the instant FIR,
which casts an aspersion on the case of the prosecution.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for
anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned
counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the
event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court
within a period of six weeks from today, be released on
Provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.
500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like
amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where
the case is pending/successor court in connection with
Bachhwara P.S. Case No. 420 of 2025, subject to the conditions
as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
7. It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court
shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the
event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case
then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the purposes of
seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his antecedent before this
Court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be
confirmed, but after verification if it is found that petitioner is a
person with clean antecedent in that event the provisional
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2367 of 2026(2) dt.27-01-2026
3/3
anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.
8. At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner
based on instruction submits that petitioner undertakes to deposit
an amount of Rs. 1,500/- with Lawyers’ Association, Patna High
Court.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sumit/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.