Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Krishna Sharma @ KrishnaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

Krishna Sharma filed a criminal miscellaneous petition (No.2376 of 2026) arising from PS case No.8 of 2025 in the High Court at Patna. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the State of Bihar was represented by learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Mr. Syed Mojibur Rahman. The court observed that there was no prosecution presented in support of the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑prosecution. The order was delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petition should be dismissed for non‑prosecution

Subjects

  • criminal procedure
  • non‑prosecution
  • petition dismissal

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2376 of 2026
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2025 Thana- EXCISE JAGDISHPUR District- Bhojpur
                  ======================================================
                  Krishna Sharma @ Krishna S/o Shailesh Sharma Resident of Village- Suhiya,
                  P.S.- Sahpur, District- Bhojpur

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :      None
                  For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Syed Mojibur Rahman
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    27-01-2026               1.    No one appears on behalf of the petitioner.

                              2.    Learned APP is present.

                              3.    The case is dismissed for non-prosecution.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sumit/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.