Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Bhola Chaudhary @ Bhola ChaudhariversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Bhola Chaudhary, applied for bail in a criminal case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that liquor was recovered from a joint family house and that he was not apprehended in possession. He argued that the 2018 amendment to the Excise Act abolished the concept of deemed possession and that he was implicated solely on secret information, with no conscious possession. The State opposed the bail, citing the petitioner’s antecedent of 14 excise cases and the alleged recovery of 160.7 liters of liquor from another house and 22.04 liters from his own. The Court considered the submissions, the lack of direct possession, and the statutory amendment, and concluded that the petitioner was not a presumed offender. Consequently, the Court ordered his release on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.5,000 with two sureties of the same amount.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner in an offence under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act given the alleged recovery of liquor and his prior excise cases.
  • Whether the 2018 amendment removing the concept of deemed possession affects the presumption of guilt in this case.

Subjects

  • bail
  • excise law
  • Section 30(a)
  • deemed possession
  • presumed offender
  • joint family property
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23987 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1004 Year-2025 Thana- MOTIHARI TOWN District- East
                                                       Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Bhola Chaudhary @ Bhola Chaudhari S/O Late Janki Chaudhary Resident of
                 Village - Balua Chikpatti (Baluwa Bazar), P.S.- Motihari Town, District - East
                 Champaran.
                                                                              ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                       ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Kanhiya Kishor
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   18-04-2026                   1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the

                   offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise

                   Act.

                                 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner has antecedent of 14 cases under the Excise Act and

                   allegation is of recovery of 160.7 liters of liquor from house of

                   Sunarpati Devi and 22.04 liters of liquor from house of

                   petitioner.

                                 4. Learned   counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner was not apprehended from the spot as such nothing

                   was recovered from his conscious possession and the house in

                   question is a joint family property, as such, it cannot be alleged

                   with certainty that it was petitioner who had kept the liquor in
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.23987 of 2026(2) dt.18-04-2026
                                                        2/2




                      the house or the liquor kept in the house was within his

                      knowledge and after amendment in the excise act in the year

                      2018, the concept of deemed possession and presumed offender

                      has been done away with and he came to be implicated based on

                      secret information which is the easiest way to implicate

                      someone without holding a proper investigation. It is also

                      submitted that petitioner earlier in similar manner came to be

                      implicated in cases relating to Excise. It is also submitted that

                      petitioner is in custody since 20.01.2025 and if privilege of bail

                      is granted, the petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate

                      in the trial to prove his innocence.

                                   5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the bail

                      application of the petitioner.

                                   6. Considering the submissions made by the learned

                      counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, is

                      directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.

                      5000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like

                      amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where

                      the case is pending/successor court in connection with Motihari

                      Town P.S. Case No. 1004 of 2025.


                                                        (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-
U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.