Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Chhotu Kumar @ Shri Chhotu MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

Summary

Chhotu Kumar petitioned for bail in a case involving alleged possession of 56 litres of country‑made liquor recovered from a motorcycle, charged under Sections 274, 275 and 317(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The prosecution argued that the liquor was seized and the petitioner was arrested on the spot. The petitioner contended that he had no knowledge of the liquor, no incriminating material was found in his possession, he had no prior criminal record, and the statutory requirement of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 was not complied with. The State opposed bail. Considering the lack of direct evidence, the petitioner’s clean record, and the period already spent in custody, the Court inclined to grant bail, ordering a bond of Rs.15,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner under the circumstances of the case
  • Whether the requirements of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 have been complied with
  • Whether the petitioner poses a risk of fleeing or tampering with evidence

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • illegal liquor
  • prohibition law
  • criminal procedure
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • Section 103
  • court order

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2473 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-130 Year-2025 Thana- ANGARGHAT District- Samastipur
                 ======================================================
                 Chhotu Kumar @ Shri Chhotu Mahto S/O Late Mahesh Mahto R/O Village-
                 Imlighat Ullobara, P.S.- Sadar, District- Darbhanga
                                                                            ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                     ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Rakesh Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Ram Sevak Choudhary, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
                 MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   19-01-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Angarghat P.S. Case No. 130 of 2025, instituted for the offences

                   punishable under Sections 274, 275 and 317(4) of the Bharatiya

                   Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition

                   and Excise Act.

                                3. The prosecution case, in short, is that total 56 liters

                   of country made liquor was recovered from motorcycle.

                   Petitioner was arrested on the spot.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the

                   present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from

                   the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2473 of 2026(2) dt.19-01-2026
                                                       2/2




                     no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. He further

                     submits that neither the alleged seized country made liquor nor

                     the motorcycle has any concern with the petitioner. The

                     petitioner is in custody since 21.11.2025 and has got no criminal

                     antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the

                     Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

                                  5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

                     the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

                                  6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

                     of the case and the period of custody undergone by the

                     petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

                                  7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing

                     bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two

                     sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court

                     below/concerned Court in connection with Angarghat P.S. Case

                     No. 130 of 2025.



                                           (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
manish/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.