Patna High Court
Chhabila NutversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
The Court dismissed the modification application, refusing to extend the surrender time.
Summary
The petitioner, Chhabila Nut, had been granted anticipatory bail by the High Court with a condition to surrender to the police within a specified time. The petitioner failed to surrender within that period and subsequently filed a modification application seeking an extension of the surrender deadline. The learned counsel for the State opposed the modification, arguing that the statutory conditions should be strictly adhered to. The Court reiterated its consistent stance that it will not extend the surrender time where the petitioner has neither surrendered nor applied before the expiry of the original period. Consequently, the Court dismissed the modification application. The order reflects the principle that anticipatory bail conditions are to be complied with strictly.
Issues considered
- Whether a court can extend the time for surrender under an anticipatory bail order when the petitioner has not surrendered within the stipulated period.
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- modification application
- surrender deadline
- time extension
- criminal procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24900 of 2026
In
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47985 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-65 Year-2025 Thana- MALAHI District- East Champaran
======================================================
Chhabila Nut S/O Nagina Nut R/O Vill.-Sirani nut toli, P.S.- Malahi, Dist.-
East Champaran, Motihari
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sumit Kumar Gupta
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Iftekhar Mahmood
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 10-04-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
A.P.P. for the State.
2. The Court is taking a consistent view of not
extending the time of surrender if the petitioner has not
surrendered within the time stipulated in the order by which he
was granted anticipatory bail or has not moved the Court prior
to the time of surrender expiring.
3. Accordingly, the instant modification application is
dismissed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
amit/-
U T
Checking your session…