Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Saurabh Kumar @ Kanhaiya Kumar @ Kanhaiya YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Saurabh Kumar, had filed an anticipatory bail application in a criminal case. While the application was pending, he was arrested. He then sought the court's permission to withdraw his anticipatory bail application. The court granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a petitioner may withdraw an anticipatory bail application after being arrested

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25272 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2026 Thana- SAMASTIPUR MUFFASIL District-
                                                         Samastipur
                  ======================================================
                  Saurabh Kumar @ Kanhaiya Kumar @ Kanhaiya Yadav S/o Vishwanath
                  Yadav @ Srawan Ray Resident of Village- Musapur, P.S.- Muffasil, Dist.-
                  Samastipur

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Ajay Kumar
                  For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    21-04-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                    A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission

                    to withdraw the anticipatory bail application, as petitioner was

                    arrested during pendency of the same.

                                 3. Permission is accorded.

                                 4. The anticipatory bail application of the petitioner is

                    dismissed as withdrawn.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
amit/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.