Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sanjay SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners subject to bond, sureties, and conditions under Section 482(2) of the CrPC.

Summary

The petitioners, Sanjay Sahani, his wife Sona Devi, and his brother Vinod Sahani, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (PS 370/2025) that alleged offences under numerous sections of the BNS and Section 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act. They contended that they have clean antecedents (Vinod having one prior excise case) and that the allegations of mob violence against police were vague and made only to pressure their relative Nagendra Sahni. The State opposed the bail, arguing the seriousness of the offences. The Court examined the submissions and, noting the lack of direct involvement and the general nature of the accusations, granted anticipatory bail subject to a Rs 10,000 bond and two sureties, with conditions under Section 482(2) of the CrPC. The order directs the trial court to release the petitioners if arrested within six weeks, provided they comply with the bail conditions.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioners under the circumstances of the case
  • Whether the allegations against the petitioners are sufficient to deny bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Section 482
  • mob assault
  • police violence
  • bail conditions
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25281 of 2026
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-370 Year-2025 Thana- PIPRAKOTHI District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
           1.     Sanjay Sahani S/o Nagendra Sahani Resident of village - Panditpur, Malahi
                  Tola, P.S.- Piprakothi, Distt.- East Champaran
           2.    Sona Devi W/o Sanjay Sahani Resident of village - Panditpur, Malahi Tola,
                 P.S.- Piprakothi, Distt.- East Champaran
           3.     Vinod Sahani S/o Nagendra Sahani Resident of village - Panditpur, Malahi
                  Tola, P.S.- Piprakothi, Distt.- East Champaran
                                                                            ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                     ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Abhishek Kumar
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Shailendra Kumar
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   21-04-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case

                   registered for the offences punishable under Sections 223, 191(2),

                   191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 324(4), 132, 109, 352, 351(3)

                   of the BNS and Section 45 of Bihar Prohibition and Excise

                   (Amendment) Act.

                                3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

                   petitioner no.1 and 2 are persons with clean antecedent and

                   petitioner no.3 has antecedent of one case under the Excise Act

                   and petitioner no.2 is a woman and allegation is that a mob created

                   ruckus when police force reached the house of Nagendra Sahni

                   and damaged the government vehicle and even assaulted the force

                   leading to injury.
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25281 of 2026(2) dt.21-04-2026
                                                         2/2




                                    4. It is next submitted that petitioners were not arrested

                       from the spot. It is also submitted that allegation of assault is

                       general and omnibus in nature. It is next submitted that petitioners

                       came to be implicated being sons and daughter-in-law of Nagendra

                       Sahni. It is also submitted that petitioners have been implicated

                       only with a view to coerce Nagendra Sahni into submission with

                       general and omnibus allegation.

                                    5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for

                       anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

                                    6. Considering the submissions made by the learned

                       counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the

                       event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from

                       today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of

                       Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the

                       like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where

                       the case is pending/successor court in connection with Piprakothi

                       P.S. Case No.370/2025, subject to the conditions as laid down

                       under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.



                                                 (Satyavrat Verma, J)
amit/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.