Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Akhilesh YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The Court held that permission may be granted to withdraw an anticipatory bail application, and the application is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Akhilesh Yadav, had filed an anticipatory bail application under the Criminal Procedure Code. While the application was pending, he was arrested by the police. The petitioner’s counsel then sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. The Court, after hearing the counsel, granted permission to withdraw the application. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a petitioner may be permitted to withdraw an anticipatory bail application after being arrested.

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal of application
  • Criminal Procedure Code

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25363 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-196 Year-2020 Thana- VIJAYEPUR District- Gopalganj
                  ======================================================
                  Akhilesh Yadav S/o Jagarnath Yadav @ Jagnnath Yadav R/o Village -
                  Thakurai Belwa, P.S. -Bhore, District - Gopalganj.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    18-04-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                    A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission

                    to withdraw the anticipatory bail application as petitioner was

                    arrested during pendency of the same.

                                 3. Permission is accorded.

                                 4. The anticipatory bail application of the petitioner is

                    dismissed as withdrawn.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
amit/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.