Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Vidyasagar Yadav @ BabluversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner subject to a bond of Rs.15,000 with two sureties and conditions of appearance.

Summary

The petitioner, Vidyasagar Yadav, sought bail in a case registered under Sections 103 and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, relating to an alleged unnatural death. The prosecution alleged that a dead body was recovered and that the petitioner was implicated during investigation, though his name was not in the FIR and no specific overt act was attributed to him. The petitioner argued false implication, lack of eyewitnesses, and highlighted his prolonged custody since September 2025 and prior criminal antecedents. The State opposed bail, but the court considered the parity with a co‑accused who had already been granted bail and the duration of custody. Consequently, the court granted bail on condition of a Rs.15,000 bond with two sureties, one of whom must be a close family member, and mandatory appearance at every trial date.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner under Sections 103 and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 given the facts of the case.
  • Whether the absence of a specific overt act and the length of pre‑trial custody justify the grant of bail.
  • Whether the conditions imposed (bond, sureties, appearance requirement) are appropriate and sufficient.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Section 103
  • Section 61(2)
  • unnatural death
  • custody
  • surety

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2555 of 2026
                          Arising Out of PS. Case No.-215 Year-2025 Thana- KOPA District- Saran
                 ======================================================
                 Vidyasagar Yadav @ Bablu Son of Sipahi Yadav @ Sipahi Prasad Yadav
                 Resident of Village- Sartharwa, P.S.- Darauli, District- Siwan

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwary, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Choubey Jawahar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH
                 MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   23-02-2026                  Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwary, learned counsel for

                   the petitioner and Mr. Choubey Jawahar, learned APP for the

                   State.

                               2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kopa

                   P.S. Case No. 215 of 2025 instituted for the offences under

                   Sections 103, 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

                               3. Prosecution case, in short, is that police recovered a

                   dead body and a case of unnatural death was registered.

                               4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the

                   petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case.

                   Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner

                   transpired in this case during investigation and one Satish Yadav

                   identified the dead body as his brother Brajesh Yadav. No
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2555 of 2026(3) dt.23-02-2026
                                             2/3




          specific overt act is alleged against the petitioner. There is no

          any eye-witness to the occurrence. It has been submitted on

          behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since

          07.09.2025 and has eight criminal antecedents. The co-accused

          person has already been granted bail by a coordinate Bench of

          this Court vide order dated 20.02.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No.

          83918 of 2025

                        5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

          opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

                        6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

          of the case, claim based on parity as also the period of custody

          undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail

          to the petitioner.

                        7. Let the petitioner be released on bail, after framing

          of charge, if not already framed, on furnishing bail bonds of

          Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of

          the    like     amount      each      to   the      satisfaction   of   Court

          below/concerned Court in connection with Kopa P.S. Case No.

          215 of 2025, subject to the following conditions:

                        (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of

          the family of the petitioner.

                        (II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2555 of 2026(3) dt.23-02-2026
                                                       3/3




                     fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two

                     consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the

                     bail bonds of the petitioner.



                                           (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
Alok Verma/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.