Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Pawan Kumar @ Pawan RaiversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary

Petitioner Pawan Kumar filed a criminal miscellaneous petition against the State of Bihar. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the State was represented by Ms. Asha Devi. The court noted the absence of any prosecution in the matter. Consequently, Justice Satyavrat Verma dismissed the petition on the ground of non-prosecution. No further factual or legal analysis was provided.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petition can be entertained in the absence of any prosecution

Subjects

  • non-prosecution
  • petition dismissal
  • criminal miscellaneous
  • procedural default

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25729 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-37 Year-2026 Thana- SARAI RANJAN District- Samastipur
                  ======================================================
                  Pawan Kumar @ Pawan Rai S/o Kamlesh Rai Resident of Village- Naua
                  Chak, ward no. 06, Bhagwatpur, P.S.- Sarairanjan, Dist.- Samastipur, Bihar,
                  India

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :      None
                  For the Opposite Party/s :      Ms.Asha Devi
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    22-04-2026               1.    No one appears on behalf of the petitioner.

                              2.    Learned A.P.P. for the State is present.

                              3.    The case is dismissed for non-prosecution.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sumit/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.