Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ajeet Kumar PaswanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

Bail was denied to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Ajeet Kumar Paswan, was arrested in connection with a case of assault and loot amounting to Rs.2,20,700 and gold articles, alleged to have participated in the crime. He has been in custody since 18 January 2026 and has three prior criminal antecedents. The petitioner applied for bail under Section 310(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, submitting a self‑inculpatory statement. The court noted his participation in the loot, the self‑incriminating statement, and his criminal record, and declined to grant bail. Consequently, the bail application was dismissed, with the court clarifying that its observations are limited to this bail application and do not prejudice the trial’s merits.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner under Section 310(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita considering his participation in the loot, self‑inculpatory statement, and prior criminal antecedents?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Section 310
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • loot
  • criminal antecedents
  • self-inculpatory statement
  • Patna High Court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25738 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-6 Year-2026 Thana- LAHERIMUHALLA District- Nalanda
                 ======================================================
                 Ajeet Kumar Paswan S/o Awadhesh Paswa R/o Village - Bari Pahari, P.S. -
                 Laheri, Dist. - Nalanda.

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :       Mr.Aditya Kumar, Advocate
                 For the State           :       Mr.Murli Dhar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   06-05-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Laheri

                   P.S. Case No. 06 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable

                   under Section 310(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

                                 3. Unknown criminals after assaulting the victim

                   committed loot of Rs. 2,20,700/-, gold articles etc. The

                   petitioner along with other co-accused persons are alleged to

                   have participated in the loot.

                                 4. The petitioner is in custody since 18.01.2026

                   having three criminal antecedents.

                                 5. The regular bail application of co-accused Goru

                   Paswan @ Jitendra Paswan and Gautam Paswan @ Vicky

                   Paswan have been rejected by this Court vide order dated
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25738 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026
                                                       2/2




                     06.04.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 21594 of 2026 and the order

                     dated 08.04.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 21699 of 2026

                     respectively.

                                  6. Considering the fact that the petitioner had

                     participated in the loot and has given self inculpatory statement

                     together with the fact that the petitioner has three criminal

                     antecedent, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

                                  7. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.

                                  8. It is, however, clarified that the observations made

                     herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail

                     application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at

                     any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not express

                     any opinion on the merits of the case.


                                                                          (Sandeep Kumar, J)

P. Kumar

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.