Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ajmal HusainversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Ajmal Husain was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. The petitioner, through counsel, requested that the anticipatory bail application be withdrawn in view of his arrest. The court considered whether a pending anticipatory bail application could be withdrawn after the petitioner’s arrest. No substantive legal reasoning was recorded in the order. The court granted the petitioner's request and dismissed the anticipatory bail application as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application can be withdrawn after the petitioner has been arrested

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25788 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-393 Year-2025 Thana- GORAUL District- Vaishali
                  ======================================================
                  Ajmal Husain son of Dr. Ali Husain Resident of Village- Mohammadpur
                  Gangti (Sehan) PS- Goraul (Kathara) District- Vaishali

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Sudha
                  For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Bhanu Pratap Singh
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    04-05-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                    A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                    petitioner was arrested during the pendency of the instant

                    anticipatory bail application.                Thus, seeks permission to

                    withdrawn this bail application.

                                 3. As prayed for, the anticipatory bail application is

                    dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                                       (Satyavrat Verma, J)
sanjeev/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.