Patna High Court
Surendra Mahto @ Surendar MahatoversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- ALLOWED
- Bench
- ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
Holding
The court granted bail to the petitioner with a bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties, subject to conditions.
Summary
Surendra Mahto was arrested in connection with a case involving the seizure of 800 litres of spirit from a Scorpio vehicle, charged under sections 338, 336(3), 304(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and sections 30(a), 41(1), 33 and 34 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner claimed he was neither the owner nor the driver, asserted that he was falsely implicated, and argued that the police failed to comply with Section 105 of the B.N.S. during the seizure. He had been in judicial custody since 14 March 2026, while the State opposed bail citing six prior similar offences. After hearing both sides, the court considered the procedural lapse, the petitioner's claim of innocence, and his antecedents, and decided to grant bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions that he not commit similar offences and cooperate with the trial court. The bail order was directed to the 2nd Exclusive Special Excise Judge, Saran at Chapra.
Issues considered
- Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner pending trial for offences under the B.N.S., 2023 and the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
- Whether the alleged non‑compliance with Section 105 of the B.N.S. during seizure warrants bail.
- Whether the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedents justify denial of bail.
Legislation cited
- B.N.S., 2023 — s. 105, 304(2), 336(3), 338
Subjects
- bail
- criminal procedure
- seizure
- procedural lapse
- prior convictions
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
- B.N.S., 2023
- false implication
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25790 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-217 Year-2026 Thana- MADHAURAH District- Saran
======================================================
Surendra Mahto @ Surendar Mahato S/O Late Jitan Mahato @ Jitan Mahto
R/O Vill.- Amnour Dih harnarayan, P.S.- Amnour, Dist.- Saran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Wasi Mohammad, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Asha Devi, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
2 18-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection
with Marhowra P.S. Case No. 217 of 2026 registered for the
offence punishable under Sections 338, 336(3), 304(2) of the
B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 30(a), 41(1), 33 and 34 of the Bihar
Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that from a
Scorpio vehicle, altogether 800 liters of spirit were recovered.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has
committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this
case. He also submits that the petitioner is neither owner nor
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25790 of 2026(2) dt.18-04-2026
2/3
driver and was not in the alleged vehicle. He further submits
that the brother of the petitioner has filed a petition before S.P.,
Saran, stating that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in
this case and proper investigation and CDR location should be
collected, which will go to show that the petitioner was at the
place of the occurrence at the time of recovery. He further
submits that the witnesses of the seizure list are police
personnel, and the police have not complied with Section 105 of
the BNSS while making the seizure. Moreover, the petitioner is
languishing in judicial custody since 14.03.2026.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP
for the State and submits that the petitioner has criminal
antecedent of six cases of similar nature.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and
considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is
inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail with the condition
that the petitioner shall not indulge himself in similar nature
of offences in future and shall also cooperate in the court
below. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on
bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand
only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of the learned 2nd Exclusive Special Excise Judge,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25790 of 2026(2) dt.18-04-2026
3/3
Saran at Chapra in connection with Marhowra P.S. Case No.
217 of 2026.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Sudhanshu/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.