Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Chandan NoniyaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner, directing release upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of the same amount.

Summary

The petitioner, Chandan Noniya, was arrested in connection with alleged illegal possession of 55.665 litres of liquor recovered from the house of Urmila Devi, invoking Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act. He contended that the liquor was not in his conscious possession, that the recovery occurred at a location unrelated to him, and that the case against him relied solely on a confessional statement made by Urmila while in police custody, which he argued lacks evidentiary value. The petitioner also disclosed a history of ten prior cases, six of which pertain to the Excise Act, and had been in custody since 15‑11‑2025. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offences and the petitioner’s criminal antecedents. The Court, after considering the submissions, held that the lack of direct evidence and the reliance on a custodial confession warranted release on bail, subject to a bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties of equal amount.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Excise Act given the circumstances of the case.
  • Whether a confessional statement made by a co‑accused in police custody can form the basis for continued detention.
  • Whether the petitioner’s prior criminal record, including six excise cases, precludes the grant of bail.

Subjects

  • bail
  • excise law
  • Section 30(a)
  • Section 41
  • confessional statement
  • prior criminal record
  • Bihar

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2584 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-159 Year-2025 Thana- BRAHMPUR District- Buxar
                 ======================================================
                 Chandan Noniya S/o Jayram Noniya @ Jay Ram Monia R/o - Lalanji Ka
                 Dera, P.O And P.S - Brahampur, District - Buxar, Bihar

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Abhishek Mishra, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   30-01-2026               1.    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                             2.    The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the

                   offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar

                   Excise Act.

                             3.    Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner has antecedent of ten cases out of which six cases are

                   under the Excise Act and allegation is of recovery of 55.665

                   liters of liquor from house of Urmila Devi.

                             4.    Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was

                   recovered from his conscious possession and even alleged

                   recovery is from a place which does not belong to the petitioner

                   and he has no concern or relation with Urmila but then he came
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2584 of 2026(2) dt.30-01-2026
                                                        2/2




                      to be implicated based on confessional statement of Urmila in

                      police custody which does not have any evidentiary value. It is

                      also submitted that once an accused is implicated in a case

                      relating to excise, the police starts implicating mechanically

                      either at the instance of Chowkidar, local person, confessional

                      statement or secret information without holding a proper

                      investigation. It is next submitted that petitioner is in custody

                      since 15-11-2025.

                               5.     Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for

                      bail of the petitioner.

                               6.     Considering the submission made by learned

                      counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be

                      released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees

                      Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                      satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is

                      pending/successor court in connection with Brahampur P.S.

                      Case No. 159 of 2025.



                                                (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.