Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ram Sabad RaiversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Summary

The petitioner, Ram Sabad Rai, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a FIR (Kesariya P.S. Case No. 364 of 2025) filed under multiple sections of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023, alleging assault in a land dispute. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner assaulted the informant’s husband and brother‑in‑law, causing injuries, while the petitioner contended that the injuries were simple and that a related case against Manish Kumar had already been rejected. The Court noted the prior rejection of the Manish Kumar case and observed that the injuries to the victims were indeed simple. Considering these facts, the Court exercised its power under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code to grant anticipatory bail, imposing standard bail conditions. The order directed the petitioner to furnish a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and comply with several conditions, including regular appearances before police and courts.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under Section 438 CrPC in view of the allegations of assault under the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023.
  • Whether the prior dismissal of the case against Manish Kumar influences the petitioner's liability.
  • Whether the nature of the injuries (simple) warrants the grant of anticipatory bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 438 CrPC
  • assault
  • land dispute
  • Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita
  • simple injury
  • bail conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25867 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-364 Year-2025 Thana- KESARIA District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Ram Sabad Rai S/o Late Heera Rai R/o Vill- Bairiya, P.S.- Kesariya, Distt-
                 East Champaran

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Manoj Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Bharat Bhushan, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   22-04-2026                  Heard the parties.

                                2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection

                   with Kesariya P.S. Case No. 364 of 2025                      instituted under

                   Sections 189(2), 126(2), 115(2), 109, 117(2), 118(1), 76, 303(2),

                   190 of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023 lodged on 08.08.2025

                   by the informant, Anita Devi.

                                3. As per the prosecution story, the allegation is that

                   due to land dispute, Manish Kumar gave farsa blow to Rajdeo

                   Rai, the informant’s father-in-law, this petitioner assaulted both

                   the husband as also brother-in-law causing injury on their head.

                   Allegation against Nitesh Kumar and Avnish Kumar is of

                   assaulting father-in-law as a result whereof, the hand and legs

                   were fractured. Further case of outraging the modesty and

                   snatching chain is also there. This led to the FIR.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25867 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026
                                            2/4




                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

          there is case and counter case. Though, allegation of assault is

          on this petitioner. With the help of injury report, it has been

          shown that the injuries have been found be simple in nature.

                       5.    Learned APP as also learned counsel for the

          informant opposes the prayer submitting that allegation of

          assault is there and further, the case of Manish Kumar stands

          rejected in Cr. Misc. No. 6494 of 2026.

                       6. Having heard the parties and perusing the record,

          thought the case of Manish Kumar stands rejected, as recorded

          above, the allegation against him is of assaulting the father-in-

          law of the informant by farsa.

                       7. So far as this petitioner is concerned, the injuries

          inflicted to the husband and brother-in-law have been found to

          be simple in nature.

                       8. Considering the submissions aforesaid, this Court

          is inclined to extend him the privilege of anticipatory bail.

                       9. Let the petitioner be released on bail, in the event

          of his arrest or surrender before the concerned court within a

          period of four weeks from the receipt of this order, on furnishing

          bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of

          the like amount each in connection with Kesariya P.S. Case No.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25867 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026
                                            3/4




          364 of 2025 to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st

          Class, East Champaran, Motihari subject to the conditions as

          laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also the other

          conditions.

                       (i) one of the bailor should be the family

          member/relative of the petitioner who shall provide official

          document (Aadhar Card/Driving License/Voter ID/Pan Card

          etc.) to show his/her bona fide;

                       (ii) the petitioner shall be appearing before the police

          station as and when required for cooperating in the

          investigation;

                       (iii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date

          before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive

          dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his

          bail bond by the Trial Court itself;

                       (iv) the petitioner shall appear before the concerned

          police station every fortnight for next six months to mark his

          attendance and at the end of the period a certificate be submitted

          before the Trial Court failing which the State shall be at liberty

          to take steps for cancellation of bail bonds;

                       (v) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or

          promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences,
             Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25867 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026
                                                         4/4




                       failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for

                       cancellation of the bail bonds;

                                    (vi) the petitioner shall desist from committing any

                       criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty

                       to take steps for cancellation of his bail bonds.



                                                      (Rajiv Roy, J)
Ravi/-

U        T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.