Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ranjai Singh @ Ranjai Kumar SinghversusThe state of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

Ranjai Singh was charged under Sections 309(6), 118(1) and 109 of the Bihar Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act for allegedly snatching Rs. 1,50,000 and firing at an informant, who sustained a gunshot injury. He has been in custody since 10 March 2025 and this was his second application for regular bail, the first having been rejected. The charge sheet was framed on 9 March 2026 and only two of eight witnesses have been examined, with the trial expected to take about six more months. The court noted the prolonged pre‑trial detention of over a year and the incomplete investigation. Considering these factors, the court granted regular bail on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted to the accused given the seriousness of the offences, the stage of trial, and the length of pre‑trial detention.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • robbery
  • attempt to murder
  • Arms Act
  • pre‑trial detention
  • high court
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26040 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-56 Year-2025 Thana- UDWANTNAGAR District- Bhojpur
                 ======================================================
                 Ranjai Singh @ Ranjai Kumar Singh, aged about 32 years, gender male Son
                 of Ambika Singh, Resident of Village- Darshan Chhapra Ke Tola, Police
                 Station Udwantnagar, District Bhojpur.
                                                                          ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
                 The state of Bihar
                                                                   ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Ramakant Sharma, Sr. Advocate
                                                 Mr. Rahul Singh, Advocate
                                                 Mr. Mayank Raj, Advocate
                                                 Mr. Adarsh Prasar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Md. Ataur Rahman, APP
             ======================================================
            CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA
                                   ORAL ORDER

4   15-05-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner seeks bail in Sessions Trial No. 86 of

                   2026 arising out of Udwantnagar P.S. Case No. 56 of 2025

                   registered for the offence punishable under Sections 309(6),

                   118(1) and 109 of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

                                 3. This is the second attempt for regular bail of this

                   petitioner. Earlier the prayer for bail of this petitioner was

                   rejected by this Court in Cr. Misc. Nos. 44682 of 2025, vide

                   order dated 03.09.2025, respectively.

                                 4. As per allegation in the FIR, petitioner along with

                   other co-accused person snatched cash amounting to Rs.

                   1,50,000/- from the informant and also made open fire after
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26040 of 2026(4) dt.15-05-2026
                                            2/3




          which the informant sustained gunshot injury in the left hand of

          the informant.

                       5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

          petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence and has

          falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that during

          investigation the alleged country made pistol has been recovered

          from the house of co-accused person namely Nitish Kumar and

          nothing incriminating articles has been recovered from the

          conscious possession of the petitioner. He next submits that

          charge has been framed but no witnesses has been examined till

          date. Petitioner is in custody since 10.03.2025.

                       6. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

          regular bail of the petitioner.

                       7. From perusal of the FIR and impugned order of the

          learned Additional Sessions Judge-17th, Bhojpur, Ara dated

          25.03.2026, it appears that this is the second attempt for regular

          bail of this petitioner. Earlier the prayer for bail of this petitioner

          was rejected by this Court in Cr. Misc. Nos. 44682 of 2025, vide

          order dated 03.09.2025. From perusal of the report regarding the

          stage of trial from the Court               of the learned District and

          Additional Sessions Judge-XVIIth, Bhojpur at Ara vide letter

          no. 64 of 2026 dated 30.04.2026, it appears that charge has
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26040 of 2026(4) dt.15-05-2026
                                                       3/3




                     been framed against this petitioner on 09.03.2026 and summons

                     were issued to the witnesses. Two witnesses out of eight have

                     been examined as yet and the expected time for concluding the

                     trial is almost six months and the petitioner is in custody since

                     10.03.2025, almost more than one year, so considering all these

                     aspects of the case and submission of learned counsel for the

                     petitioner, I am inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner.

                                  8. Accordingly the prayer for regular bail of the

                     petitioner is allowed. Let              the petitioner above named be

                     released on regular bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-

                     (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                     satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-17th,

                     Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Session Trail No. 86 of 2026

                     arising out of Udwantnagar P.S. Case No. 56 of 2025.


                                                               (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)

Anand Kr

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.