Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sudhir KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner, subject to a bond and conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Summary

Sudhir Kumar was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after 120 litres of illicit beer were seized from a Scorpio vehicle. A co‑accused, Mithlesh Kumar, identified Sudhir and another person as having fled the scene, but no liquor or any other material was found in Sudhir's possession. Sudhir, who has no prior criminal record, pleaded innocence, asserting he was neither the owner nor the driver of the vehicle. The State opposed his bail application, while his counsel argued that the only evidence against him was the co‑accused’s statement. The Court, after considering the circumstances, ordered his release on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner when the only evidence is the statement of a co‑accused in a case under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • prohibition law
  • excise
  • illicit liquor
  • co‑accused statement
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26071 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-222 Year-2026 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Nawada
                 ======================================================
                 Sudhir Kumar son of Prakash Mahto Resident of Village- Marui, narayanpur,
                 Ps- Roh, Dist- Nawada

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Ms. Sucheta Yadav, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   22-04-2026                           Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                      2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a case

                   registered under Sections 30(a) and 41 of Bihar Prohibition and

                   Excise Act.

                                      3. As per prosecution case, 120 liters illicit beer

                   was recovered from Scorpio vehicle bearing Reg. No. JH01-S-

                   8660. Apprehended co-accused Mithlesh Kumar disclosed the

                   name of the petitioner and co-accused Mukesh Kumar Paswan

                   @ Jamura that they fled away from the spot.

                                      4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely

                   been implicated in the present case. Further submission is that

                   petitioner is neither the owner nor the driver of the seized
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26071 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026
                                                        2/2




                      vehicle and he has no concern with the seized liquor. Nothing

                      has been recovered from the conscious possession of the

                      petitioner. Except the disclosure statement of apprehended co-

                      accused, there is nothing material against the petitioner.

                      Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and he undertakes to

                      cooperate in the investigation and trial.

                                   5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposed the prayer for

                      bail.

                                   6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

                      of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties,

                      let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the event

                      of arrest or surrender before the Court concerned within a period

                      of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000

                      (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

                      each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Excise

                      Court No. 2, Nawada, in connection with Nawada Excise P.S.

                      Case No. 222 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down

                      under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha

                      Sanhita, 2023.



                                              (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J)
utkarsh/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.