Patna High Court
Arvind Yadav @ Arvind KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- D.F.D. FOR NON APPEARANCE
Holding
The petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution as the petitioner did not appear before the court.
Summary
Arvind Yadav filed a criminal miscellaneous petition before the Patna High Court seeking relief against the State of Bihar. No counsel or party appeared on behalf of the petitioner despite repeated calls. The State was represented by Advocate Mr. Bharat Lal. The presiding judge noted the absence of any petitioner representation. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑prosecution. No substantive merits of the petition were examined.
Issues considered
- Can a petition be entertained when the petitioner fails to appear or be represented before the court?
Subjects
- non‑prosecution
- petition dismissed
- court procedure
- criminal miscellaneous
- absence of representation
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26269 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-446 Year-2024 Thana- BARACHATTI District- Gaya
======================================================
Arvind Yadav @ Arvind Kumar Son of Beer Yadav Village- Baijnathpur PS-
Mohanpur, Dist- Gaya
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bharat Lal- A.P.P.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
4 18-08-2025 1. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner on
repeated calls.
2. Learned A.P.P. for the State is present.
3. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed for non-
prosecution.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
vikash/-
U T
Checking your session…