Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Tufani KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted regular bail to the petitioner.

Summary

Tufani Kumar was arrested in connection with alleged possession of firearms and charged under Sections 25(1‑b)a and 26 of the Arms Act. He had been in custody since 1 January 2024 and had previously faced three rejected bail applications in the same court. The petitioner claimed innocence, clean antecedents and that no firearms were recovered from his possession. The State opposed bail, but the court noted the prolonged pre‑trial detention of over two years, the lack of detail on prosecution witnesses, and an expected trial duration of only three months. Considering these factors, the court inclined to grant regular bail, ordering release on a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties. The bail petition was therefore allowed.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted to the accused under Sections 25(1‑b)a and 26 of the Arms Act given the length of pre‑trial detention and the stage of trial.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Arms Act
  • pre‑trial detention
  • regular bail
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26422 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1083 Year-2023 Thana- PURNEA SADAR District- Purnia
                 ======================================================
                 Tufani Kumar, Male, aged about 24 years, Son of Kishnu Urao @ Kishun
                 Urawn @ Kishnu Uraon, Resident of Anna Mahal Hansdah, P.S.- Sadar,
                 District- Purnea.
                                                                         ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                 Versus
                 The State of Bihar.
                                                                  ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Ms. Niharika Rani, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Abhay Kumar, APP
              ======================================================
            CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA
                                    ORAL ORDER

3   15-05-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the

                   offence punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a and 26 of the Arms

                   Act.

                                3. This is the fourth attempt for regular bail of the

                   petitioner. Earlier the prayer for bail of this petitioner was

                   rejected by this Court in Cr. Misc. Nos. 23358 of 2024, 70146 of

                   2024 and 62172 of 2025 vide orders dated 15.04.2024,

                   31.01.2025 and 07.11.2025 respectively.

                                4. As per allegation in the FIR, it is a case of recovery

                   of firearms from the possession of the petitioner.

                                5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence and has
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26422 of 2026(3) dt.15-05-2026
                                            2/3




          falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that nothing has

          been recovered the conscious possession of the petitioner. He

          further submits petitioner has got no concern with the alleged

          recovery. Petitioner has got clean antecedent as stated in para 3

          of the petition and is in custody since 01.01.2024.

                       6. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

          regular bail of the petitioner.

                       7. From perusal of the FIR and impugned order of the

          learned 2nd District and Additional Sessions Judge, Purnea dated

          19.02.2026, it appears that this is the fourth attempt for regular

          bail of this petitioner. Earlier three bail petition of this

          petitioner was already rejected by this Court. From perusal of

          the report regarding stage of trial from the Court of the learned

          Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate- 1st, Purnea vide letter no.

          221 of 2026 dated 21.04.2026, it appears that charge has been

          framed against this petitioner under Section 25(1-B)a/26 of the

          Arms Act on 23.07.2025 but the trial Court did not disclosed

          how many prosecution witnesses have been examined and the

          expected duration for concluding the trial is almost three

          months. Petitioner is under custody for more than almost two

          years and three months, so considering all these aspects of the

          case and submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, I am
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26422 of 2026(3) dt.15-05-2026
                                                       3/3




                     inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioner.

                                  8. Accordingly the prayer for regular bail of the

                     petitioner is allowed. Let              the petitioner above named be

                     released on regular bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-

                     (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

                     satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-1, Purnea in connection

                     with Session Sadar P.S. Case No. 1083 of 2023.


                                                             (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J)

Anand Kr

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.