Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ajay RamversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court allowed the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioner Ajay Ram was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. He approached the court seeking permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application after his arrest. The court, after hearing counsel, granted the request to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive discussion on the merits of the bail application was made.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application can be withdrawn after the petitioner has been arrested

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26514 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-240 Year-2025 Thana- PHULWARIYA District- Gopalganj
                 ======================================================
                 Ajay Ram S/o Harinarayan Ram Resident of Village- Dube Sariswa, P.S.-
                 Mirganj, District- Gopalganj
                                                                        ... ... Petitioner/s
                                              Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                 ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Manoj Kumar, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   24-04-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner was arrested during pendency of the anticipatory bail

                   application, thus, seeks permission to withdraw the same.

                                3. Permission is accorded.

                                4. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is

                   dismissed as withdrawn.


                                                                       (Satyavrat Verma, J)

Kundan/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.