Patna High Court
SANJEEV KUMARversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
Provisional anticipatory bail is granted subject to bond, sureties, and verification of antecedent, with confirmation contingent on the trial court’s findings.
Summary
The petitioner, Sanjeev Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 2,203.2 litres of liquor from three vehicles. He argued that he was not arrested at the scene, had no possession of the liquor, and was not the owner of the vehicles, asserting a clean criminal record. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail, contending that the information leading to his implication came from a local chowkidar and that the FIR omitted the informant's name. The State opposed the bail. The Court granted provisional anticipatory bail conditioned on a Rs. 500 bond and two sureties, directing the trial court to verify the petitioner’s antecedent before confirming the bail.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act.
- Whether the petitioner’s lack of possession and clean antecedent justify the grant of anticipatory bail.
- Whether the trial court must verify the petitioner’s criminal antecedent before confirming the provisional bail.
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- Bihar Excise Act
- liquor seizure
- clean antecedent
- Section 30(a)
- Section 482(2)
- provisional bail
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26629 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-24 Year-2026 Thana- RAJEPUR District- East Champaran
======================================================
SANJEEV KUMAR S/o Shambhu Mandal Resident of village- Naraha Got,
PS- Rajepur, District- East Champaran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ujjwal Kumar Singh
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Bishweshwar Ram
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 23-04-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case
registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the
Bihar Excise Act.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and allegation is of
recovery of 2203.2 litres of liquor from three different vehicles.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was
recovered from his conscious possession and is not the owner of
any of the seized vehicles and he came to be implicated at the
instance of Chowkidar and local people, but then it is submitted
that if Chowkidar was aware about the involvement of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26629 of 2026(2) dt.23-04-2026
2/3
petitioner in the occurrence, then why he did not inform the
police prior to institution of the instant FIR, which casts an
aspersion on the case of the prosecution and the name of the
local person, who disclosed the name of the petitioner, is not
disclosed in the FIR, when petitioner has not been implicated
based on secret information and is a person with clean
antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for
anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned
counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the
event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks
from today, be released on Provisional anticipatory bail on
furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with
two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the
learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in
connection with Rajepur P.S. Case No. 24 of 2026, subject to
the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
7. It is made clear that thereafter the learned Trial Court
shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the
event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case
then it would be presumed that petitioner, for the purposes of
seeking anticipatory bail, had concealed his antecedent before this
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26629 of 2026(2) dt.23-04-2026
3/3
Court, as such, the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be
confirmed, but after verification if it is found that petitioner is a
person with clean antecedent in that event the provisional
anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sumit/-
U T
Checking your session…