Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kauslender KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court held that the prima facie case was weak and the petitioner was not shown to have intent to cause death, thereby granting bail.

Summary

The petitioner, Kauslender Kumar, was named in an FIR for assault, extortion and related offences under several sections of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita 2023. He contended that the FIR was based on hearsay and that the injuries inflicted on the informant were not on vital parts and did not show an intention to cause death. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed bail, arguing the seriousness of the charges. The court examined the prima facie evidence, noting the reliance on undisclosed sources and the nature of the injuries, and concluded that there was no clear intention to cause death. Consequently, the court ordered the petitioner’s release on bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

Issues considered

  • Whether the FIR establishes a prima facie case for the offences alleged under the BNSS
  • Whether the nature of the injuries demonstrates an intention to cause death
  • Whether bail should be granted under Section 482(2) of the BNSS in view of the evidence

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • hearsay
  • intention to cause death
  • assault
  • extortion
  • criminal procedure
  • BNSS
  • Section 482
  • prima facie

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26738 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-159 Year-2025 Thana- BHAGWANPUR District- Vaishali
                 ======================================================
                 Kauslender Kumar, Son of Shashikant Ray, Resident of village-Rahsa Kabari
                 Tola, P.S-Bhagwanpur, Dist- Vaishali.                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
                 The State of Bihar.                                ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Arvind Kumar Sinha, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   27-04-2026                    Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing

                   on behalf of the State.

                                    2. The accused/petitioner named in FIR and

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S.

                   Case No.           159 of 2025 registered for the offences

                   punishable under Sections 115, 126(2), 351(2), 352, 109,

                   303(2) and 3(5) of Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita 2023.

                                3. As per FIR, petitioner alleged to assault

                   informant while he refused to pay extortion money to

                   petitioner and co-accused persons and also taken away cash

                   of Rs. 11,800/-, which was kept in his pocket for payment to

                   cement shop owner.

                                4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26738 of 2026(2) dt.27-04-2026
                                            2/3




          behalf of the petitioner that the present FIR was lodged on

          17.06.2025 for the occurrence dated 13.06.2025 out of

          local disputes and differences, where name of petitioner was

          disclosed to informant by unknown person. It is pointed out

          that on the basis of hearsay input collected from unknown

          sources, the petitioner was named with present FIR. It is

          submitted that even as per injury report, three injuries were

          found upon the informant, where the injury found on frontal

          and parietal region of the head and injury no. 2 which was of

          chest pain found simple in nature whereas the third injury

          the lacerated right hand, which upon examination found

          fractured. It is submitted that the grievous injury was on

          non-vital part and not appears repeated and, therefore, it

          can be safely said that the petitioner was not under intention

          to cause death of the informant.

                       5. Learned APP opposed the prayer of bail.

                       6. In view of aforesaid factual submissions and by

          taking note of fact as the name of petitioner was disclosed

          by the informant after five days of the occurrence, prima

          facie that too on the basis of hearsay input from undisclosed
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26738 of 2026(2) dt.27-04-2026
                                                          3/3




                        source, coupled with the fact that the injury which found

                        upon vital part of the body also found simple in nature,

                        prima facie negating intention to cause death, accordingly,

                        above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest or

                        surrender before the learned trial Court, within a period of

                        four weeks of the order, is directed to be released on bail

                        furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand)

                        with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction

                        of the learned A.C.J.M.-VI, Successor Court, Vaishali at

                        Hajipur/concerned Court, where the case is pending in

                        connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No.             159 of 2025

                        subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2)

                        of the BNSS.



                                              (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
veena/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.