Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Vijay Kumar RayversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court held that bail should be granted to the petitioners subject to a bond and conditions under the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

Summary

The petitioners Vijay Kumar Ray and Ayush Kumar applied for bail fearing arrest in a case registered under sections 126(2), 127(2), 115(2), 109(1), 303(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for alleged assault, outrage of modesty and theft. The prosecution alleged that the accused entered the informant’s house, abused and assaulted him with lathi and danda, attempted to outrage the modesty of female members and stole money and jewellery. The petitioners contended they are innocent, are agnates of the informant, and the incident arose from a dispute over a common pathway, presenting clean antecedents. The State opposed the bail application. The Court, after applying the provisions of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, ordered that the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of ₹30,000 each, subject to conditions under Section 482(2).

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused in view of the alleged offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
  • Whether the nature and seriousness of the alleged offences warrant denial of bail under the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • criminal procedure
  • assault
  • outrage of modesty
  • theft
  • family dispute
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26909 of 2026
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-17 Year-2025 Thana- UDAKISHUNGANJ District- Madhepura
                 ======================================================
           1.     Vijay Kumar Ray S/o- Late Surendra Ray R/v- Laxmipur, W.No-26, Uda
                  Kishunganj Ps- Uda Kishunganj Dist- Madhepura
           2.    Ayush Kumar S/o- Sri Vijay Kumar Ray R/v- Laxmipur, W.No-26, Uda
                 Kishunganj Ps- Uda Kishunganj Dist- Madhepura

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Amit Kumar Anand, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   22-04-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioners who apprehend arrest in connection

                   with Udakishunganj P.S. Case No. 17 of 2025 lodged on

                   15.01.2025, for the offences punishable under sections 126(2),

                   127(2), 115(2), 109(1), 303(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya

                   Sanhita, 2023.

                                3. As per the prosecution, the F.I.R. has been lodged

                   against four named accused persons, including the present

                   petitioners. It is alleged that the accused persons went to the

                   house of the informant, started abusing him, and assaulted him

                   with lathi and danda, etc., and also attempted to outrage the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26909 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026
                                            2/3




          modesty of the female members of the informant’s family. It is

          further alleged that the accused persons snatched money and

          jewellery from the informant.

                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

          petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. He

          further submits that the petitioners and the informant are

          agnates, and the informant and petitioner no. 1 are full brothers,

          while petitioner no. 2 is the nephew of the informant. It is

          submitted that a dispute arose between the parties over a

          common pathway, which led to a scuffle, resulting in injuries to

          both sides. There is also a case and counter-case between the

          parties, as contained in Annexures-1 and 2 to the bail

          application. It is further submitted that the petitioners have clean

          antecedents.

                       5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

          bail.

                       6. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the

          above-named petitioners be released on bail, in the event of

          their arrest or surrender before the Trial Court within a period of

          four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of ₹30,000/-

          (Rupees Thirty Thousand only) each, as mentioned in Section

          2(1)(d) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to the
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26909 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026
                                                        3/3




                      satisfaction of the learned ACJM, 1, Uda Kishunganj,

                      Madhepura, in connection with the aforementioned case,

                      subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of

                      the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.



                                                  (Dr. Anshuman, J)
Ashwini/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.