Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
209 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200
The applicant, accused No.4, sought discharge under Section 250 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, from charges of abetment of suicide under Sections 80, 85 and 108 read with Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The trial court rejected the discharge application, …
The applicant, Priya Davahale, sister‑in‑law of a deceased doctor who committed suicide, sought discharge under Section 250 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 from charges under Sections 80, 85 and 108 r/w Section 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The trial court rejected the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quashment of FIR No. 0439 of 2024, which alleged offences under IPC sections 323, 498‑A, 504, 506 and 34 for domestic cruelty and dowry demands. The informant, Madhuri, accused her husband …
The petitioners, members of two rival Mahajan groups, filed cross‑petitions seeking the quash of FIRs No. 39/2024 and 40/2024 and the related chargesheets in criminal cases IPC/104/2025 and IPC/102/2025, arising from a dispute over a religious function. Both groups entered into a mutual settlement, …
The petitioners, members of two rival Mahajan groups, filed cross‑petitions seeking the quash of FIRs No. 39/2024 and 40/2024 and the related chargesheets in criminal cases IPC/104/2025 and IPC/102/2025, arising from a dispute over a religious function. Both groups executed a consent agreement …
The applicant, Sagar alias Akash Sandip Sabale, an employee of Mauli Finance Pvt. Ltd., faced charges under several sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and the Maharashtra Money Lending (Regulation) Act, 2014 for allegedly threatening a loan borrower to recover a debt. He filed an …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking quashing of a criminal complaint lodged against them before the Economic Offences Wing, Mumbai, and alternatively asked for service of the complaint or a closure report under Section 173(3)(i) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The State’s …
The petitioners, organizers of a musical event at NSCI Dome, sought quashing of FIR No.251/2026 alleging offences under Sections 106(1), 289 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The deceased, a 28‑year‑old doctor’s brother, collapsed at the event and died; post‑mortem indicated death due …
The petitioner sought quashing of criminal proceedings (S.C.C. No.13465 of 2026) arising from FIR No.0523/2025 for offences under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and the Motor Vehicles Act. The parties had resolved the underlying motor‑accident dispute through a settlement dated 23 June 2026, with full …
Two writ petitions were filed by accused Krushna Ramnath Naik and Dr. Mayur Vasudeo Borole seeking quash of FIR No. 935 of 2025 and the accompanying chargesheet. During anticipatory bail proceedings, the parties executed consent terms agreeing to settle the dispute, with Rs.17 lakh already paid to …
The petitioners, who were the original accused in FIR No.165/2024 alleging offences under IPC sections 409, 420 r/w 34 and the Maharashtra Depositors Act, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution and Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quash …
The High Court of Gujarat considered a regular bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a FIR alleging offences under Sections 317(2), 317(4), 318(4) and 3(5) of the BNSS and Sections 66(C) and 66(D) of the IT Act, 2000. The …
The Assistant Commissioner of Central Excise Department filed an application under Section 378(4) of the CrPC and Section 419(4) of the BNSS seeking leave to appeal an acquittal of the accused in a case involving offences under the IPC and the Central Excise and Salt Act. The High Court examined …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, challenged the trial court’s acquittal of the accused. Relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran, the High Court examined whether a complainant who is also the victim …
The complainant, Dasadiya Mehul Ganapatlal, sought leave to appeal an acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, filed under Section 378(4) CrPC and Section 419(4) BNSS. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. A. …
The appellant, the original complainant in a cheque dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the acquittal of the accused by filing a petition under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS. The key issue was whether the complainant, as the victim, could invoke the …
The complainant, Sanjaykumar Pandit, challenged the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by a Judicial Magistrate. He filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 378(4) CrPC and Section 419(4) BNSS seeking leave to appeal. The High Court examined …
The complainant, Abu Textiles, sought leave to appeal an acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, arguing that as the victim he is entitled to appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the CrPC. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in …
Shahbaz Khan was charged under Sections 8(c), 22(b) and 29 of the NDPS Act for alleged possession and sale of 4.6 grams of Mephedrone. After the investigation was completed and a charge‑sheet filed, he filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. …
Lata Ratan Rokade filed a bail application seeking relaxation of a bail condition under Section 483(i)(b) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (equivalent to Section 439(i)(b) of the CrPC). The applicant, through counsel Satyavrat Joshi, later requested to unconditionally withdraw the …
The High Court of Gujarat entertained a criminal miscellaneous application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking successive regular bail for Ghanashaymbhai @ Manu Shanabhai Parmar after a charge‑sheet was filed for offences under Sections 65‑A, 65(e), 116‑B …
Saurashtra Cement Ltd, the original complainant in a cheque‑dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the trial court's acquittal of the accused. The appellant argued that, following the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran, the …
Air Control and Chemical Engineering Co. Ltd., the original complainant, appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran, which held that the complainant …
Shree Ram Transport Finance Co. Ltd., through its power of attorney, appealed against the acquittal of the accused in a cheque‑bounce case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and Section 419 of the Bharatiya …
Laxmi Insecticides Pvt Ltd, as the original complainant, appealed against the acquittal of Saurashtra Agro Chemicals by the Metropolitan Magistrate in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) and Section …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS, appealed against the acquittal of the accused by the 5th Additional Civil Judge, Ahmedabad (Rural). The High Court examined recent Supreme Court jurisprudence, particularly Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran, …
The appellant, the original complainant, filed an appeal under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS against the acquittal of the accused by the Judicial Magistrate. The issue was whether a complainant in a cheque‑dishonour case (Section 138 NI Act) is a victim entitled to file an appeal under the …
The appellant, Rina Ghanashyam Harjani, filed an appeal under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS against the acquittal of the accused in a cheque‑bounce case (Section 138 NI Act) by the 14th Additional Judicial Magistrate, Vadodara. The core issue was whether the original complainant, being the …
The High Court of Gujarat considered an application for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, filed by Raman Kantpal, a director of M/s. WLTPE, who was alleged to have orchestrated a large-scale GST fraud involving fake invoices and wrongful input tax credit …
The applicant, Ramakant Pal, a director of M/s WLTPE, was arrested in April 2026 for allegedly orchestrating a large-scale GST fraud by issuing fake invoices to claim input tax credit of Rs.63.21 crore, affecting 18 beneficiary companies. A complaint under Sections 32(1)(b), 31(c), 332(1)(i), 332(5) …
The original complainant, Kiritkumar Kantilal Vora, appealed the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court considered whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the …
Keraliya Finance, the original complainant, appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court considered the …
Keraliya Finance, the original complainant, appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court considered the …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS, appealed the acquittal of the accused in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal under …
Mumira Yunus Katwarawala, through her attorney, appealed the acquittal of the accused in a cheque‑dishonour case filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was made under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha …
Mass Financial Services Ltd., through Vijay Krushnakant Kadiya, appealed the acquittal of Gopalbhai Makwana & Anr. under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, contending that the complainant, as the victim of a cheque‑bounce offence under Section 138 of …
The appellant, a cooperative credit society, filed an appeal under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS against the acquittal of the accused by the 4th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate. The appellant argued that, following the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran, …
The appellant, the original complainant, appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (now BNSS). The High Court examined the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran, which held that a complainant who is also the victim …
The appellant, the original complainant in a cheque dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the acquittal of the accused by filing a petition under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS. The High Court examined recent Supreme Court jurisprudence, …
The appellant, the original complainant in a cheque dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the trial court's acquittal of the accused. The issue was whether the complainant, as the victim, could file an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the Criminal …
The appellant, Siddikbai Sikanderbhai Vohra, the original complainant in a cheque‑dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court’s acquittal of the accused. The High Court examined …
Vasudev Kapadiya, the original complainant, appealed the acquittal of Paritosh Jariwala and another under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The Gujarat High Court referred to the …
The petitioner Bhavan Gandhi was arrested in connection with FIR C.R. No.11993004230013 alleging violations of Sections 65(a)(e), 98(2), 81 and 116‑B of the Prohibition Act. After the investigation concluded, a charge‑sheet was filed and the petitioner applied for regular bail under Section 483 of …
The original complainant, Zehra Taherbhai Cyclewala, appealed the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The issue was whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the Criminal …
The appellant, Dineshbhai Kanjibhai Patel, filed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking leave to appeal the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by a Judicial Magistrate. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) and …
Mangaldas Ramjibhai Vestiyan, the original complainant in a cheque‑dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the acquittal of the accused before the High Court of Gujarat under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The …
The appellant, Nitesh Balumal Teckwani, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS, appealed the acquittal of the accused in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case. The issue was whether the complainant, deemed the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal …
The original complainant, Omkar Aluminium Furniture (through its owner), appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha …
The original complainant, F Tech Engineering Co. (partner Jigneshbhai Mansukhbhai Pambhar), appealed against the acquittal of the accused Shashi Khushiram Agrawal et al. for an alleged offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The issue was whether the complainant, as the …
The appellant, the original complainant, filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against an acquittal order dated 19.05.2016. The High Court examined whether a complainant, who is also the victim under a cheque‑dishonour case (Section 138 of the Negotiable …
The appellant, the original complainant in a cheque‑bounce case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed against the trial court’s acquittal of the accused. The issue was whether the complainant, as the victim, could file an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the …
The appellant, the original complainant, filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita against the trial court’s acquittal of the accused in a cheque‑dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The principal issue was …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS, appealed the acquittal of the accused in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case. The High Court examined whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal under the proviso …
The original complainant filed an appeal under Section 378 CrPC/Section 419 BNSS against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by the Additional Judicial Magistrate, Patan. The issue was whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could …
Madhu Enterprise, the original complainant, appealed against the acquittal of Balabhai Shah & Anr in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined whether the complainant, deemed the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could invoke the proviso to Section 372 of the …
Madhu Enterprise, the original complainant, appealed against the acquittal of Balabhai Shah & Anr in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined whether the complainant, deemed the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could invoke the proviso to Section 372 of the …
The original complainant, Patel Yogshbai, appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The issue was whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the Criminal Procedure …
The appellant, Patel Yogeshbhai Bhanubhai, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The issue was whether the original complainant, who is also the victim of a dishonoured cheque, has …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS, appealed against the acquittal of the accused in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The issue was whether the complainant, deemed the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal …
The appellant, the original complainant under the Criminal Procedure Code and the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, appealed against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The key issue was whether the complainant, as the victim of a …
The appellant, Gujarat State Co. Agri and Rural Development Bank Ltd, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS against the acquittal of the accused in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case. The issue was whether the original complainant, who is also the victim of a …
Shree Ram Transport Finance Co. Ltd, through its representative, appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, seeking …
Shree Ram Transport Finance Co. Ltd, the original complainant in a cheque‑dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the acquittal of the accused by the 2nd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of …
Shree Ram Transport Finance Co. Ltd., the original complainant, appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The issue was whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of …
Shree Ram Transport Finance Co. Ltd, as the original complainant, appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined …
Shree Ram Transport Finance Co. Ltd., the original complainant in a cheque‑dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the acquittal of the accused. The appellant relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran, which held that the …
Shree Ram Transport Finance Co. Ltd, as the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS, appealed the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined whether the complainant, being the victim of a dishonoured cheque, has a …
The appellant, the original complainant, appealed against the acquittal of the accused in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The issue was whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the Criminal …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS, appealed against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The key issue was whether the complainant, deemed the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an …
Rohan Arvindbhai Modiyaa appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined the Supreme Court’s …
The original complainant, Rohan Arvindbhai Modiyaa, appealed against the acquittal of the accused in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, …
The original complainant, Rohan Arvindbhai Modiyaa, appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The Gujarat High …
The original complainant, Rohan Arvindbhai Modi, appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court considered whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, has a statutory right to file an appeal under the proviso to …
The original complainant, Rohan Arvindbhai Modiyaa, appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). The …
The original complainant, Rohan Arvindbhai Modi, appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, asserting that the complainant, as the …
The original complainant, Rohan Arvindbhai Modiya, appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, asserting that the complainant, as the …
The appellant, Devang Dinubhai Shah, the original complainant in a cheque‑dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the Metropolitan Magistrate’s order of acquittal. He invoked Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, …
The appellant, Swami Vivekanand Credit Cooperative Society Ltd, filed an appeal under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS against the acquittal of the accused in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined recent Supreme Court authority in Celestium …
The appellant, the original complainant in a cheque dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the trial court's acquittal of the accused. The High Court examined whether the complainant, as a victim, is entitled to file an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of …
The appellant, the original complainant in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the acquittal of the accused by invoking Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS. The High Court examined whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, is …
The applicants, Rameshbhai Popatbhai Solanki and another, sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, after a charge‑sheet was filed for offences under Sections 108, 115(2), 85 and 54 of the same Act. The State opposed bail, arguing the applicants were …
The applicant, Laluram, filed a bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking successive regular bail for offences under the Prohibition Act. The State opposed, alleging the applicant's involvement in the crime. The court examined bail principles, …
Hansaben Jagdishbhai Soni, the original complainant, appealed against the acquittal of Hiteshbhai Harshadbha Raval and another under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The issue was whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal under the proviso to …
Amit Baldevbhai Patel, the original complainant, appealed the acquittal of Nitin Rasiklal Dave under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS, appealed against the acquittal of the accused in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gyanasekaran, which held that the …
Ashokbhai Ramjibhai Maniya, the original complainant in a cheque‑dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the trial court's acquittal of the accused. The appellant filed the appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS, appealed against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court referred to the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran, …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS, appealed the acquittal of the accused in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal under …
Baldevji Pratapji Rajput, the original complainant in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the acquittal of the accused by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patan. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha …
Manvenrasinh Narendrasinh Sindha, the original complainant, appealed the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The trial court had acquitted the accused, and the appellant filed the appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS. The High …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS, appealed against the acquittal of the accused in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case. The issue was whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal under the proviso to …
The appellant, the original complainant, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS challenging the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The central issue was whether the complainant, as the victim of a …
The appellant Kahan Enterprise, the original complainant in a cheque‑dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the trial court's acquittal of the accused. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and Section 419 of the Bharatiya …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS, appealed the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The issue was whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal under the proviso to …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS, appealed the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The issue was whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal under the proviso to …
The original complainant, Kiritbhai Rameshbhai Trivedi, appealed under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS against the acquittal of the accused in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case. The High Court examined whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could invoke the …
The appellant, the original complainant in a cheque dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the acquittal of the accused by a Judicial Magistrate. The issue was whether the complainant, as the victim, could file an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the …
Samirbhai Navinchandra Patel, the original complainant, appealed the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The issue was whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed against the acquittal of the accused by the 3rd Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patan. The issue before the Gujarat High Court was whether the complainant, deemed the victim of a dishonoured …
The appellant, the original complainant, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS against the acquittal of the respondent in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined whether the complainant, deemed the victim of a dishonoured …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the trial court's acquittal of the accused. The High Court examined the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran, which held that a complainant in a Section 138 case …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS, appealed the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal under the …
The appellant, Pravinbhai Naginbhai Patel, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The key issue was whether the original complainant, who is also the victim of a …
The original complainant, Dharmeshbhai Dhirajbhai Patel, appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The key issue …
Ashwin Babubhai Patel, the original complainant, appealed the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, has a statutory right to file an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS, challenged the acquittal of the accused in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case. The High Court examined the recent Supreme Court judgment in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran, which held …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS, appealed against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined recent Supreme Court jurisprudence, particularly Celestium Financial Ltd. v. …
The appellant, the original complainant in a cheque‑dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the trial court's acquittal of the accused. The issue was whether the complainant, as the victim, could file an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the Criminal …
Mahendra Mithalal Chopra appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, claiming the right to file an appeal as the victim‑complainant. The High Court examined the recent Supreme Court judgment in Celestium Financial v. A. Gnanasekaran, which held …
The Borsad Urban Co‑operative Credit Society, as the original complainant, appealed against the acquittal of Rajeshkumar Thakor and another under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code and Section 419 of the Bharatiya …
The original complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act filed a criminal complaint, and the trial court acquitted the accused. The complainant appealed the acquittal under Section 378(4) CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined the …
Maheshbhai Sadhu, the original complainant, appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The issue was whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the Criminal Procedure …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS, appealed the acquittal of the accused in a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act case. The High Court examined whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, has a statutory right to file an appeal …
The original complainant, Premjibhai Madhabhai Makvana, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 419(4) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) seeking leave to appeal an acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, relying on …
The original complainant, Prajapati Vijaybhai, appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The issue was whether the complainant, as the victim of a dishonoured cheque, could file an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the Criminal …
The original complainant, Pravinbhai Naginbhai Patel, appealed against the trial court’s acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant relied on the Supreme Court’s decision in Celestium Financial v. A. Gyanasekaran, which held that the complainant is …
The appellant, the original complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed against the acquittal of the accused by the 10th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rajkot. The High Court examined whether a complainant in a cheque‑dishonour case is deemed a victim entitled to …
The High Court of Gujarat considered an application for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, filed by Aabid Mohmadyamin Shaikh in connection with FIR No.11191038260057 alleging offences under Sections 108 and 115(2) of the same Act. The applicant claimed …
The Visnagar Nagrik Sahakari Bank Ltd. (in liquidation) appealed against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, arguing that as the complainant it is the victim and therefore entitled to file an appeal under the proviso to Section 372 of the Criminal …
The applicant, Junedbhai Javedbhai Jindani, filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, after a charge‑sheet was filed for offences under Sections 316(2) and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The State opposed the bail, alleging active …
The applicant, Mahmadirsad Mahmadfajal Mahmad, filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, after a charge-sheet was filed for offences under the Gujarat Prohibition Act. The State opposed the bail, alleging the applicant's involvement in the …
The applicant, Dhruvrajsinh Hakubha Gohil, filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with FIR No. 11198067260284 alleging offences under Sections 305(a), 331(4), 317(2) and 54 of the same Act. The State opposed bail, arguing the …
Maheshkumar Ramanlal Shah, the original complainant in a cheque‑dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the trial court's acquittal of the accused. He invoked Section 378 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha …
The applicant sought regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with an FIR for offences under the Gujarat Prohibition Act (sections 65(a), 65(e), 81, 83, 98(2) and 116‑B). The applicant was a labourer involved in loading and unloading prohibited …
The Court considered an application filed by a 17‑year‑7‑month‑old rape victim seeking termination of her 24‑week pregnancy under Articles 226, 227 of the Constitution, Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971. A medical board …
The complainant appealed the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The High Court referred to its …
The appellant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat, held …
The appellant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court referred to its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat, which held that a …
The appellant, Sahjanand Hareshbhai Patel, filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita against the trial court’s acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, citing its recent decision in …
The complainant appealed an acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court, referring to its recent decision in Shivsinh …
The complainant appealed the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court referred to its recent decision …
The appellant, Bharatsang Bhagwansang Jadeja, filed an appeal against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The …
The appellant, Sureshkumar Prabhuram Thakkar, filed an appeal under CrPC Section 378 and BNSS Section 419 against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined a recent precedent (Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat) …
The appellant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, citing its recent decision in …
The complainant appealed the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court, referencing its recent decision …
The appellant filed an acquittal appeal under CrPC Section 378 and BNSS Section 419 against the trial court's order acquitting the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat (Criminal …
The appellant, a complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, filed an appeal against the trial court's acquittal of the accused. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The …
The appellant, Saikrupa Mahila Co.Op.Credit Society, filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referencing its recent …
The complainant filed a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against the respondents, who were acquitted by the trial court. The complainant appealed the acquittal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha …
The appellant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal of the respondent on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of …
The petitioners filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal of the respondents on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The petitioners sought transfer of the appeal to the Sessions Court, relying on a recent …
The appellant Harshal Indravadan Patel filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant sought to have the appeal heard by the High Court. The Court referred to …
The Sanjari Co-operative Society Ltd filed an appeal against the trial court's acquittal of the State under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High …
The appellant, Shri Umia Co-operative Credit Society Ltd., filed an appeal against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha …
The appellant, Rakeshbhai Ratilal Patel, filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal of the respondents on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh …
The complainant appealed an acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court noted a recent decision that a victim in a Section 138 complaint has a specific right to appeal to the Sessions Court under the proviso of Section 372 of the Code of Criminal …
Friends of Women World Banking India appealed the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita before the Gujarat High Court. The Court …
The High Court of Gujarat disposed of two acquittal appeals filed under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) against a trial court order acquitting the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Court referred to its recent …
The petitioner, a 16‑year‑old rape victim, sought a direction under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution, the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita and the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act to terminate her 25‑week pregnancy. The High Court earlier ordered a medical committee to examine her, which …
The complainant appealed an acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, filing the appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh …
The applicants filed a Special Criminal Application under the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quashing of FIR No. 11824008250002 of 2025 registered with Mahila Police Station, Tapi, for offences under Sections 85, 86, 115(2), 352 and 54 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The …
The complainant appealed an acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, filing the appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh …
Shree Ram Transport Finance Company Ltd filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant argued that the High Court was the proper forum to entertain the …
The appellant Reliance Industries Ltd., through a power of attorney, filed an appeal against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Section 419 of the Bharatiya …
The High Court of Gujarat heard an appeal against the acquittal of respondents charged under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant, Reliance Industries Ltd., invoked Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, seeking to challenge the …
The appellant filed an acquittal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh …
The appellant filed an appeal against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court, referring to its recent decision in Shivsinh …
The appellant, Marwadi Shares & Finance Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant sought to have the appeal heard by the High Court, but the Court …
The appellant, Kamlesh B. Patel, filed an acquittal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita against the trial court's acquittal of the respondents on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined whether …
Paragbhai Dipakbhai Joshi filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant argued that, as a victim, he possessed a specific …
The appellant Jagdishbhai Bhikhabhai Patel filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Relying on a recent decision of this Court in …
The appellant, Prakash Mansukhbhai Rathod, filed an appeal against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High …
The appellant filed an appeal against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, invoking Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki …
The appellant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat, held that a …
Imranbhai Ramjanbhai Sipahi appealed to the Gujarat High Court against his acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The Court referred to its recent decision …
The appellant, Talod Nagrik Sahkari Bank Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant sought to have the appeal heard by the High Court. The High …
The appellant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined a recent decision (Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat, 23.12.2025) …
The appellant, Amitkumar Babulal Patel, filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. …
The complainant appealed the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court examined whether such an appeal …
The complainant, Akbarbhai Sulemanbhai Patel, appealed the trial court’s acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court …
The complainant appealed an acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The trial court had acquitted the accused, and the appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The …
The appellant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined whether it had jurisdiction to entertain the appeal or whether it must be …
The appellant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant sought transfer of the appeal to the Sessions Court, relying on a recent decision of this Court …
The appellant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat (Criminal …
The appellant, a complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, filed an appeal against the trial court's acquittal of the accused. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The …
The complainant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined whether it had jurisdiction to hear the appeal or whether it must be transferred …
The appellant, Anilbhai Maganlal Gatecha, filed an appeal against his acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined a recent precedent (Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat) which held that a complainant‑victim has a specific right to …
The appellant filed an appeal against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, invoking Sections 378 of the CrPC and 419 of the BNSS. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat, held that a …
Icon Financial Service, through Gautambhai Revabhai Chavda, appealed against the trial court’s acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined whether it had jurisdiction to entertain the appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the …
The complainant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita against the trial court’s acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined whether it could entertain the appeal or had to …
The appellant, Amisha Shah, filed an appeal against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court, …
The appellant filed an acquittal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court’s acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat …
The complainant appealed an acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, filing the appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh …
The appellant, Dediyasan Industrial Co. Op. Credit Society Ltd., filed an appeal against the trial court’s acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Section 419 of the Bharatiya …
The appellant filed an acquittal appeal under CrPC Section 378 and BNSS Section 419 against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat (Cr. Misc. …
The appellant filed an acquittal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant sought to have the appeal heard by the High Court, but …
The appellant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant sought transfer of the appeal to the Sessions Court, invoking a recent decision of this Court …
The appellant, Brijeshbhai Pandya, filed an appeal against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court, referring to its …
The appellant, Dhruv Sunilkumar Patel, filed an appeal against his acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, invoking Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS. The trial court had acquitted the accused. The High Court, referencing the recent decision in Shivsinh …
The complainant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, before addressing the merits, referred …
The appellant, Rakeshbhai Gopaldas Sharma, filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against his acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referencing its recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of …
The appellant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal of the respondents on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant sought to have the appeal heard by the High Court, but the Court referred to …
The trial court acquitted Maganbhai Haribhai Virani, the managing director of Shri Mota LIlYa Credit Co‑op. Society Ltd., of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant filed appeals against the acquittal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the …
The trial court acquitted Maganbhai Haribhai Virani, the managing director of Shri Mota LIlYa Credit Co‑op. Society Ltd., of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant filed appeals under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha …
The trial court acquitted Maganbhai Haribhai Virani, the managing director of Shri Mota LIlYa Credit Co‑op. Society Ltd., of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant filed appeals against the acquittal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the …
The trial court acquitted Maganbhai Haribhai Virani, the managing director of Shri Mota LIlYa Credit Co‑op. Society Ltd., of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant filed appeals against the acquittal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the …
The trial court acquitted Maganbhai Haribhai Virani, Managing Director of Shri Mota Lilya Credit Co‑op. Society Ltd., of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant filed multiple appeals under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik …
The trial court acquitted Maganbhai Haribhai Virani, the managing director of Shri Mota LIlYa Credit Co‑op. Society Ltd., of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant filed appeals against the acquittal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the …
The trial court acquitted Maganbhai Haribhai Virani, the managing director of Shri Mota LIlYa Credit Co‑op. Society Ltd., of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant filed appeals under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha …
The trial court acquitted Maganbhai Haribhai Virani, the managing director of Shri Mota LIlYa Credit Co‑op. Society Ltd., of an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant filed appeals under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha …
