Patna High Court
Nakul KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- ALLOWED
- Bench
- HARISH KUMAR
Holding
The court held that, given the omnibus nature of the allegations, the absence of injury and the petitioners' undertaking, they are entitled to bail subject to the stipulated conditions.
Summary
The petitioners, Nakul Kumar and Ramesh Paswan, sought pre‑arrest bail fearing arrest in a case (Kadirganj PS Case No. 49 of 2026) involving offences under sections 190, 324(3), 324(4), 352, 132 of the B.N.S. and section 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022. The alleged incident arose during a separate investigation when police entered the village, and stone‑pelting by several persons, including the petitioners, allegedly damaged a police vehicle. The petitioners contended that they were merely present, no injury occurred, the witnesses were only police personnel and the charge under section 37 did not apply to them. The State opposed bail, arguing the petitioners obstructed police duties and caused damage. The court, noting the omnibus nature of the allegations, the absence of any injury and the petitioners' undertaking to cooperate, granted bail subject to a Rs 10,000 bond, two sureties and the condition that one bailor be a close family member.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioners are entitled to pre‑arrest bail despite alleged offences under sections 190, 324(3), 324(4), 352, 132 of the B.N.S. and section 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022.
- Whether the alleged stone‑pelting and damage to a police vehicle, without any injury, constitute sufficient ground to deny bail.
- Whether section 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 is attracted against the petitioners.
- Whether the petitioners' undertaking to cooperate and lack of injury justify the grant of bail.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 482(2)
- Bihar Negotiable Substances Act — s. 132, 190, 324(3), 324(4), 352
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2022 (Amended) — s. 37
Subjects
- pre‑arrest bail
- stone pelting
- police vehicle damage
- false implication
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
- Bihar Negotiable Substances Act
- Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita
- bail bond
- surety
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39118 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-49 Year-2026 Thana- KADIRGANJ District- Patna
======================================================
1. Nakul Kumar S/o Ramesh Paswan @ Tunu Paswan R/o Village - Sewai, P.S.
- Kadirganj, Dist. - Patna.
2. Ramesh Paswan @ Tunu Paswan S/o Bahadur Paswan R/o Village - Sewai,
P.S. - Kadirganj, Dist. - Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jainendra Kumar Pushkar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nagendra Prasad, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 17-06-2026 Heard the learned Advocate for the petitioners and the
learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in
connection with Kadirganj P.S. Case No. 49 of 2026, registered
for the offences punishable under Sections 190, 324(3), 324(4),
352 & 132 of the B.N.S. and Section 37 of the Bihar Prohibition
and Excise Act 2022 (Amended).
3. In course of investigation in connection with
Kadirganj P.S. Case No. 48 of 2026, when the police reached in
the village, the FIR named accused persons, including the
petitioners along with 4-5 unknown person started pelting stones
and damaged the police vehicle. The police further apprehended
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39118 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026
2/3
one person, who was found in intoxicated position.
4. Learned Advocate for the petitioners submitted that
so far the allegation of pelting stones is concerned, only because
of the fact that the petitioners were present at the place of
occurrence and some altercation had taken place between the
police and family members of the accused persons, their names
have been implicated in this case. So far Section 37 of the Bihar
Prohibition and Excise Act 2022 Amendment Act is concerned,
the same is not attracted against the petitioners. The witnesses
are also none-else but the police personnel and, as such, false
implication of the petitioners cannot be ruled out. Moreover, the
petitioners bear one criminal antecedent, however, they are on
bail in the said case. It is lastly contended that the petitioners are
ready to fully co-operate in the proceeding of the Court.
5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State
opposed the pre-arrest bail application and submits that the
petitioners have deterred the police personnel to discharge their
duty and also damaged the police vehicle.
6. Having considered the submissions advanced by
learned Advocate for the respective parties and taking note of
the omnibus nature of allegation, coupled with fact that in the
said incidence none has sustained any injury, besides the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39118 of 2026(2) dt.17-06-2026
3/3
undertaking rendered by the petitioners that they will fully co-
operate in the proceeding of the Court, let the petitioners above
named be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or
surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks
from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, upon
furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with
two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the
learned Court of Special Judge, Excise-II Patna, in connection
with Kadirganj P.S. Case No. 49 of 2026, subject to the
conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik
Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with the further condition that one of
the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the
petitioners.
(Harish Kumar, J)
shivank/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.