Patna High Court
Ranjeet KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- ALLOWED
- Bench
- HARISH KUMAR
Holding
Bail was granted to the petitioner on the condition of bond and sureties.
Summary
Ranjeet Kumar applied for bail after being implicated in a case (PS No.33/2026) under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for alleged storage and sale of foreign liquor. During a police raid on a pan factory godown, 21.75 litres of foreign liquor were seized and the petitioner, along with a co‑accused, fled the scene. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the seizure violated Sections 103 and 105 of the Bihar Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) due to lack of proper documentation and videography, and that no material satisfied the requirements of Section 76 of the Prohibition Act, while the State highlighted the petitioner’s identification at the scene and a prior similar conviction. The court examined the evidentiary deficiencies and the petitioner’s proximity to the seized premises, and concluded that the statutory safeguards were not met. Consequently, the court granted bail subject to a Rs.10,000 bond, two sureties, and conditions under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite identification at the scene and a prior conviction.
- Whether the seizure complied with statutory requirements of Sections 103 and 105 of the BNSS and Section 76 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.
Legislation cited
- Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 — s. 482(2)
- Bihar Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) — s. 103, 105
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 — s. 30(a), 76(2)
Subjects
- bail
- prohibition law
- excise
- foreign liquor
- seizure procedure
- evidentiary standards
- prior criminal antecedent
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43977 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-33 Year-2026 Thana- MANSURCHAK District- Begusarai
======================================================
Ranjeet Kumar S/o Indradeo Mahto R/o vill- Havaspur, Ward No. 04, P.S.-
Muffasil, Distt- Begusarai (Bihar)
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Sonam Kumari, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 08-07-2026 Heard Ms. Sonam Kumari, learned Advocate for the
petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the
State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection
with Mansoorchak P.S. Case No. 33/2026, registered for the
offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition
and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.
3. Acting on a tip off regarding the storage and selling
of foreign liquor from a pan factory, the police conducted raid
however, noticing the police party, two persons succeeded in
fleeing away, who were recognized as petitioner and co-accused
Jitendra Kumar. In course of such, total 21.750 liters foreign
liquor was recovered.
4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submitted that
from perusal of the FIR, it is evident that the alleged recovery
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43977 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026
2/3
has been made from the godown of the pan factory which does
not belong to the petitioner. However, only on account of the
fact the petitioner bears one criminal antecedent of identical
nature and resides nearby the factory. His name has been
implicated in this case without there being any cogent materials
suggesting his complicity in the crime. There is complete
violation of Sections 103 and 105 of the BNSS as the members
of the seizure list are none else but the police party besides no
videography has been conducted. Moreover, there is no cogent
materials which attracts the rigors provided under Section 76 of
the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.
5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State
vehemently opposed the bail application and submits that the
petitioner was identified on the place of occurrence besides he
bears one criminal antecedent of identical nature.
6. Having considered to the submissions advanced on
behalf of the respective parties and considering the fact that the
alleged recovery has been made from a godown of pan factory
situated nearby to the house of the petitioner, coupled with the
defiance with the statutory provisions of the BNSS as also
lacking materials attracting the rigors provided under Section
76(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, let
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43977 of 2026(2) dt.08-07-2026
3/3
the petitioner above named be released on bail, in the event of
his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of
four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this
order, upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand)
with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of
the learned Exclusive Special Judge-2 (Excise Act), Begusarai
in connection with Mansoorchak P.S. Case No. 33/2026, subject
to the conditions laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya
Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, with the further condition that
one of the bailors shall be the own/close family members of the
petitioner.
(Harish Kumar, J)
siddharth kr.
shaw/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.