Patna High Court
Ram Kishore SahversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- HARISH KUMAR
Holding
The court granted bail to the petitioner, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, subject to prescribed conditions.
Summary
The petitioner, Ram Kishore Sah, sought bail in connection with a FIR (Chhatauni P.S. Case No. 44 of 2026) alleging offences under several sections of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, including assault and extortion. He claimed the FIR was lodged four days after the alleged incident without a plausible explanation and that the informant and his associates were the real perpetrators, as shown by CCTV footage. The State opposed bail, arguing the petitioner’s involvement in restraining the informant’s father led to serious injuries that could be fatal. The court considered the seriousness of the accusations, the delay in filing the FIR, and the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedent under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. Balancing these factors, the court exercised its inherent power under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita and granted bail subject to conditions, including a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties and a family member as one bailor.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriateness of granting bail under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita in view of the seriousness of the offences alleged?
- Does the delay in lodging the FIR affect the bail decision?
- Do the petitioner’s prior criminal antecedents preclude bail?
Legislation cited
Subjects
- bail
- Section 482
- Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita
- delay in FIR
- serious offences
- criminal antecedent
- CCTV evidence
- extortion
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40477 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-44 Year-2026 Thana- CHHATAUNI District- East Champaran
======================================================
Ram Kishore Sah Son of Late Badari Sah Resident of Village- Chhatauni
Bazar @ Chhatuani Bazar, P.S.- Chhatauni, District- East Champaran
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anil Kumar
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Mithlesh Kumar Khare
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 01-07-2026 Heard learned Advocate for the petitioner and learned
Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection
with Chhatauni P.S. Case No. 44 of 2026, registered for the
offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109,
352, 74, 3(5) of the BNS.
3. Allegedly on the given date and time while the
father of the informant was coming from his shop, in the
meanwhile, the petitioner caught hold the hands of the
informant’s father, whereupon co-accused Manju Lal Sah
brutally assaulted him by means of brick over his head due to
which he sustained serious injury. There is further omnibus
allegation against others.
4. Learned Advocate for the petitioner submitted that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40477 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026
2/3
prior to the institution of the present case Chhatauni P.S. Case
No. 43 of 2026 was instituted against the informant and others
in which petitioner and others have sustained injuries. So far the
present case is concerned, allegedly the incidence has taken
place on 16.01.2026 but the present FIR has been instituted on
20.01.2026 without there being any plausible explanation. It is
further submitted that on 19.01.2026 the informant and others
have entered into the shop of the petitioner and assaulted the
staff of the shop and demanded extortion which led to lodging
of Chhatauni P.S. Case No. 54 of 2026. The CCTV footage
clearly suggests that the informant and others have committed
crime. So far the injury which is inflicted upon the father of the
informant is concerned, though the same has been specifically
attributed to co-accused, but till date neither any final opinion
has been submitted nor it has been deliberated in the impugned
order. The petitioner bears one criminal antecedent but the same
relates to Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
5. On the other hand, learned Advocate for the State
vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that had
the petitioner not been caught hold of the hands of the
informant’s father, he might have been abled to save himself but
because of his involvement, the father of the informant has
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40477 of 2026(2) dt.01-07-2026
3/3
sustained injuries which may prove fatal.
6. Regard being had to the submissions made on
behalf of the parties and considering the nature of accusation,
coupled with the factum of case and counter case as well as
delay in lodging of the FIR, let the petitioner abovenamed be
released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the
court below within a period of four weeks from the date of
receipt/production of a copy of this order, upon furnishing bail
bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like
amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial
Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with
Chhatauni P.S. Case No. 44 of 2026, subject to the conditions
laid down in Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha
Sanhita, 2023, with the further condition that one of the bailors
shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner.
(Harish Kumar, J)
Anjani/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.