Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Prakash MukhiyaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner subject to a bond and sureties, based on the victim’s denial of the kidnapping allegation and the delay in filing the FIR.

Summary

The petitioner, Prakash Mukhiya, was arrested in connection with a FIR alleging kidnapping of a 16‑year‑old girl for illicit intercourse or marriage, under Sections 137(2) and 140(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. During investigation the girl, as a victim‑witness, gave a statement under Section 180 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, asserting that she left her parental home of her own volition because she was in love with the petitioner and wished to live with him as a wife, thereby denying the kidnapping allegation. The petitioner’s counsel highlighted the three‑day delay in filing the FIR and the petitioner’s clean antecedents. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed bail. The court, noting the victim’s own denial of the kidnapping and the procedural delay, directed that the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the BNSS. The bail order was conditioned on surrender within four weeks and compliance with the stipulated sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail despite the FIR alleging kidnapping and sexual assault of a minor
  • Whether the victim’s statement negating kidnapping and the delay in filing the FIR justify granting bail

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • kidnapping
  • minor
  • victim statement
  • delay in FIR
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita
  • Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42797 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-141 Year-2025 Thana- BHAIRAVSHTHAN District-
                                                      Madhubani
                 ======================================================
                 Prakash Mukhiya S/o Ganesh Mukhiya Resident of Village- Bharaul, PS-
                 Bhairvasthan, Distt.- Madhubani

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner
                                                     Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                          ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner     :       Mr. Ramchandra Jha Raman, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party :       Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   07-07-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                               2. The accused/petitioner is named in the FIR and

                   apprehending his arrest in connection with Bhairvasthan P.S.

                   Case No.141 of 2025 registered under Sections 137(2), 140

                   (3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (in short (‘BNS’).

                               3. Allegation against the petitioner is to kidnap

                   minor daughter of informant aged about 16 years for the

                   purpose of illicit intercourse/ marriage with another person.

                               4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for

                   the petitioner that during the course of investigation, after

                   the recovery of daughter of informant, her statement under
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42797 of 2026(2) dt.07-07-2026
                                            2/3




          Section 180 of BNSS was recorded, where she categorically

          stated that she was in love with this petitioner and out of

          love she left her parental home and also stated that she

          want to live with this petitioner as a wife, negating the

          allegation of kidnapping and sexual assault. It is also

          submitted that the FIR was lodged with a delay of three days

          without supplying any reasons and, moreover, petitioner is a

          man of clean antecedent.

                       5. Learned APP has opposed the prayer of bail.

                       6. In view of the aforesaid facts and submission

          and by taking note of fact as victim herself negates the

          allegation of kidnapping and sexual assault saying that she

          was     in    love    with     petitioner      as    discussed   aforesaid,

          accordingly, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his

          arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of four

          weeks, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail

          bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two

          sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the

          learned A.C.J.M. 1st Jhanjharpur, Madhubani in connection

          with Bhairvasthan P.S. Case No.141 of 2025, subject to the
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42797 of 2026(2) dt.07-07-2026
                                                       3/3




                     conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of

                     Criminal Procedure (in short ‘CrPC’)/under Section 482(2) of

                     the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (in short

                     ‘BNSS’).


                                                       (Chandra Shekhar Jha, J.)

Aniket/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.