Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Guriya DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Guriya Devi, sought bail in a kidnapping case registered under Section 137(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. She had been in custody since September 23, 2025 and claimed a clean antecedent. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 180 of the BNSS indicated that she left her home voluntarily due to a family dispute and was staying with the petitioner. The court considered the victim’s statement and the petitioner’s gender and clean record, and consequently allowed the bail application. The petitioner was ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, without prejudice to the merits of the trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the accused under Section 137(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita in view of the victim’s statement under Section 180 and the accused’s clean antecedent

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • kidnapping
  • Section 137(2) BNSS
  • Section 180 BNSS
  • victim statement
  • clean antecedent
  • female accused

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26958 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-303 Year-2025 Thana- DARBHANGA SADAR District-
                                                       Darbhanga
                 ======================================================
                 Guriya Devi W/O Guddu Khalifa Resident of Village- Mirkalapur, P.S.-
                 Bakhri, Dist- Begusarai

                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Pramod Yadav S/O Lakhan Yadav R/O Chandanpatti, P.S- Sadar, Distt.-
                 Darbhanga.

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :       Mr.Ashok Kumar Jha, Advocate
                 For the State          :       Mr.Ganesh Prasad Singh, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   22-04-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with

                   Darbhanga Sadar P.S. Case No. 303 of 2025 registered for the

                   offence punishable under Section 137(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya

                   Sanhita.

                                 3. The petitioner and others are said to have

                   kidnapped the victim. The petitioner, who is a woman is in

                   custody since 23.09.2025 having clean antecedent.

                                 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   victim in her statement recorded under Section 180 of the BNSS

                   has said that she has left her house on her own due to dispute
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26958 of 2026(2) dt.22-04-2026
                                                       2/2




                     with her father. Subsequently, the victim girl has stayed in the

                     house of the petitioner.

                                  5. Considering the statement of the victim girl

                     recorded under Section 180 of the BNSS and the fact that the

                     petitioner is a woman having clean antecedent, this application

                     is allowed.

                                  6. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail

                     on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two

                     sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

                     Special Judge (POCSO Act), Darbhanga/ concerned Court in

                     connection with Darbhanga Sadar P.S. Case No. 303 of 2025.

                                  7. It is, however, clarified that the observations made

                     herein are limited to the adjudication of the present bail

                     application and shall not prejudice the case of the petitioner at

                     any subsequent stage of the trial and this Court has not express

                     any opinion on the merits of the case.


                                                                          (Sandeep Kumar, J)

P. Kumar

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.