Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Jitendra YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court permitted the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioner Jitendra Yadav was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. His counsel sought the court's permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application in view of the arrest. The court considered whether the application could be withdrawn after the petitioner’s arrest. It granted permission to withdraw the application. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Can an anticipatory bail application be withdrawn after the petitioner has been arrested?

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • criminal procedure

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27212 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-43 Year-2026 Thana- PARASBIGHA District- Jehanabad
                  ======================================================
                  Jitendra Yadav Son of Late Binda Yadav @ Binda Bind Resident of Village-
                  Kothiya, P.S.- Parasbigha, District- Jehanabad

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Paras Nath
                  For the Opposite Party/s :       Ms.Pushpa Sinha.1
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    23-04-2026               1.    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned APP for the State.

                              2.    Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission

                    to withdraw the anticipatory bail application, as petitioner was

                    arrested during pendency of the instant anticipatory bail

                    application.

                              3.    Permission is accorded.

                              4.    Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is

                    dismissed as withdrawn.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sumit/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.