Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ravindra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court allowed the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Ravindra Kumar, was arrested while his anticipatory bail application under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code was pending. He approached the court seeking permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application after his arrest. The court, after hearing counsel for both sides, granted the petitioner's request to withdraw. Consequently, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn. The order was delivered by Justice Satyavrat Verma.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application can be withdrawn after the petitioner has been arrested

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Section 438

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27263 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-19 Year-2026 Thana- TELHARA District- Nalanda
                 ======================================================
                 Ravindra Kumar S/o Vijendra Prasad @ Surhi R/o Village - Bhuara, P.S -
                 Telhara, District - Nalanda
                                                                        ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                 ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Raj Kishor Prasad, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   23-04-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   petitioner was arrested during pendency of the anticipatory bail

                   application, thus, seeks permission to withdraw the same.

                                3. Permission is accorded.

                                4. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is

                   dismissed as withdrawn.


                                                                        (Satyavrat Verma, J)

Kundan/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.