Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Santosh Mahto @ Santosh Kumar MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court held that permission may be granted to withdraw an anticipatory bail application, leading to its dismissal.

Summary

The petitioner, Santosh Mahto, was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. His counsel, Ms. Lalita Kumari, sought the court’s permission to withdraw that anticipatory bail application. The court examined whether an anticipatory bail petition could be withdrawn after the petitioner’s arrest. Justice Satyavrat Verma granted the requested permission to withdraw. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application was dismissed as withdrawn. No further substantive discussion on the merits of the bail claim was recorded.

Issues considered

  • Whether an anticipatory bail application can be withdrawn after the petitioner’s arrest
  • Whether the court may grant permission to withdraw a pending anticipatory bail application

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • withdrawal
  • arrest
  • criminal procedure
  • high court order

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2756 of 2026
                   Arising Out of PS. Case No.-198 Year-2025 Thana- TERHAGACHH District- Kishanganj
                  ======================================================
                  Santosh Mahto @ Santosh Kumar Mahto Son of Late Jhatan Mahto Village-
                  Bhorha PS- Terhagach District- Kishanganj Bihar

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :      Ms.Lalita Kumari
                  For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Kumar Ranjit Ranjan
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    28-01-2026               1.    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned APP for the State.

                              2.    Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission

                    to withdraw the anticipatory bail application, as petitioner was

                    arrested during pendency of the instant anticipatory bail

                    application.

                              3.    Permission is accorded.

                              4.    Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is

                    dismissed as withdrawn.



                                               (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Sumit/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.