Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Lukendra Kumar @ Lokendra ManjhiversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Summary

Lukendra Kumar applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in an excise case where 90 litres of illegal chulai wine were seized from a Toto. The prosecution alleged the liquor belonged to him based on the confessional statement of the driver, Prince Kumar, though Kumar was neither the owner nor driver of the vehicle. The petitioner argued that the seizure was not from his constructive possession and that the search did not follow the procedures of the Bihar Narcotic and Substances (B.N.S.S.) Act, also highlighting his clean antecedent. The court considered that the illicit liquor was not recovered from Kumar's premises or possession and noted his clean record. Consequently, the court granted anticipatory bail subject to a bond and sureties, invoking Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. Act.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner when the seized liquor is not in his constructive possession
  • Whether the seizure and investigation complied with the procedural requirements of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act and the B.N.S.S. Act

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • excise law
  • illegal liquor
  • constructive possession
  • clean antecedent
  • search and seizure

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27634 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-147 Year-2026 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Nawada
                 ======================================================
                 Lukendra Kumar @ Lokendra Manjhi S/o- Late Jagdeo Manjhi Village-
                 Sarkanda PS-Govindpur, Dist- Nawada

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr.Pramod Kumar Verma
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr.Rana Randhir Singh
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   13-05-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                                2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in

                   connection with Excise P.S. Case No.147 of 2026, F.I.R dated

                   08.02.2026 registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 30(a) and 44 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act,

                   2016.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, on 08.02.2026 at about

                   11:10 A.M., the informant, an ASI Excise, received secret

                   information and intercepted a Toto coming from Sarkanda Road.

                   The driver, Prince Kumar, was apprehended and upon search, 90

                   liters of illegal chulai wine was recovered. During interrogation,

                   the apprehended person disclosed that the seized liquor

                   belonged to the petitioner, Lukendra Kumar, following which a
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27634 of 2026(3) dt.13-05-2026
                                            2/3




          seizure list was prepared.

                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

          place of recovery is from a Toto and the petitioner is neither the

          owner nor the driver of the seized vehicle. The name of the

          petitioner has transpired on the basis of confessional statement

          of co-accused Prince Kumar. The search and seizure is said to

          have been made without adhering to the procedures / provisions

          prescribed under the B.N.S.S. Act. Lastly, it has been submitted

          that the petitioner has clean antecedent.

                       5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for

          anticipatory bail application.

                       6. Regard being had to the submission made by the

          parties, taking into consideration the fact that illicit liquor has

          not been recovered from the constructive possession and / or

          premises belonging to the petitioner and the petitioner has clean

          antecedent, accordingly, this Court is inclined to grant

          anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

                       7. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on

          anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the

          court below within a period of four weeks from today on

          furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with

          two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27634 of 2026(3) dt.13-05-2026
                                                       3/3




                     learned Exclusive Special Court, Excise-2, Nawada, in

                     connection with Excise P.S. Case No.147 of 2026 subject to the

                     condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.,

                     2023.



                                                   (Ajit Kumar, J)
sharun/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.