Patna High Court
Rahul KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- ARUN KUMAR JHA
Holding
The court granted bail to the petitioner, finding the allegations non‑specific and the possibility of false implication.
Summary
Rahul Kumar sought relief fearing arrest in connection with PS Didarganj Case No. 222 of 2025, wherein he was charged under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109 and 74 read with 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 for alleged assault on an informant and his family. The prosecution alleged that the petitioner and co‑accused assaulted the informant, disrobed his wife and stole cash and ornaments. The petitioner contended that the allegations were false, stemming from a land‑dispute‑related enmity, and that the specific charge of assault with the butt of a pistol was unsupported by the medical report, which showed only a minor laceration on the informant’s eyebrow. The court noted the absence of any specific injury attributable to the petitioner and the possibility of false implication. Accordingly, the court ordered that the petitioner be released on bail, subject to a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties and compliance with conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate bail disposition when the prosecution’s allegations are non‑specific and lack corroborating injury evidence?
- Whether the petitioner can be considered falsely implicated due to a personal dispute, warranting bail under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
Legislation cited
- B.N.S., 2023 — s. 109, 115(2), 126(2), 3(5), 74
- B.N.S.S. — s. 482(2)
Subjects
- bail
- false implication
- assault
- injury report
- land dispute
- Section 482
- Criminal Procedure
- B.N.S.
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27778 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-222 Year-2025 Thana- DIDARGANJ District- Patna
======================================================
Rahul Kumar son of Mantu Kumar @ Mantu Prasad, Resident of Village
-Nijampur, PS- Didarganj, Distt- Patna.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Jay Ram Prasad, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
ORAL ORDER
2 30-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. In the present case, the petitioner is
apprehending his arrest in connection with Didarganj P.S. Case
No. 222 of 2025, dated 22.06.2025, registered for the offences
punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109 and 74 read with
Section 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023.
3. As per prosecution case, petitioner and other co-
accused persons are alleged to have assaulted the informant, his
sons and his wife. They are also alleged to have disrobed the
wife of the informant and the co-accused sisters of the petitioner
took away cash amounting to rupees eighteen thousand and
some ornaments from the house of the informant.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27778 of 2026(2) dt.30-04-2026
2/3
case. No occurrence in the manner as alleged has ever taken
place. In fact, petitioner and informant are co-villagers and there
is previous enmity between them on account of land dispute and
for this reason informant has implicated the petitioner and his
whole family in the present case. Though there is general and
omnibus allegation of assault and other acts against the
petitioner and his family members and the only specific
allegation levelled against the petitioner is that he assaulted the
informant with butt of pistol on back of his head, however
injury report of the informant does not show any such injury and
only one injury has been found on the informant which is a
lacerated wound of size about 1 cm x 0.5 cm x skin deep above
left eyebrow and the said injury is stated to be simple in nature
caused by hard and blunt substance. It falsifies the allegation of
assault by a number of persons including this petitioner and it
also falsifies the allegation against the petitioner that he hit the
informant on the back of his head with butt of a pistol as there is
no injury on the back of head of the informant. Furthermore, all
injured persons received injuries which are stated to be simple
in nature. Petitioner is having clean antecedent.
5. Learned APP opposes the submissions made on
behalf of the petitioner.
6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27778 of 2026(2) dt.30-04-2026
3/3
submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the
fact that there is non-specific allegation against the petitioner for
any overt act and also considering the absence of injury
attributed to the petitioner and further considering the possibility
of false implication, let the petitioner, above-named, in the event
of his arrest or surrender before the Court concerned within a
period of eight weeks from today, be released on bail, on
furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand
Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate,
Patna City, Patna, in connection with Didarganj P.S. Case No.
222 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under
Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. and other following conditions:
(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the
petitioner.
(ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and
every date fixed by the Court below, if so required by the
learned trial Court.
(Arun Kumar Jha, J)
Shahnawaz/-
U T
Checking your session…