Patna High Court
Binod MahtoversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- SATYAVRAT VERMA
Holding
The modification application is dismissed; the anticipatory bail order is not altered.
Summary
The petitioners, Binod Mahto, Ranjan Mahto and Sonu Mahto, filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court seeking modification of an earlier anticipatory bail order that had been granted to them. The State of Bihar opposed the modification, contending that the bail had been obtained by concealing the petitioners' criminal antecedents. The learned judge examined whether a court can alter an anticipatory bail order on the ground of such concealment. He held that the court should not tamper with the bail order merely because of alleged concealment, emphasizing the need for consistency in bail jurisprudence. Consequently, the application for modification was dismissed, leaving the original anticipatory bail order intact.
Issues considered
- Whether an anticipatory bail order can be modified on the ground that it was obtained by concealing the applicant's criminal antecedent
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- modification of bail
- concealment of antecedent
- Criminal Procedure Code
- bail jurisprudence
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28633 of 2026
In
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.79093 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-266 Year-2025 Thana- BAHERA District- Darbhanga
======================================================
1. Binod Mahto S/o- Late Mahaveer Mahto R/o - Jaynatinagar Dath, Ward
No.06, P.S - Bahera, District - Darbhanga
2. Ranjan Mahto S/o- Late Sikendra Mahto R/o - Jaynatinagar Dath, Ward
No.06, P.S - Bahera, District - Darbhanga
3. Sonu Mahto S/o- Late Sikendra Mahto R/o - Jaynatinagar Dath, Ward
No.06, P.S - Bahera, District - Darbhanga
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Alias Ashok Karn
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Khurshid Anwar
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
ORAL ORDER
2 24-04-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the
learned APP for the State.
2. The Court is taking a consistent view of not
modifying the order by which anticipatory bail was granted to
the petitioner in the event if the same was obtained by
concealing the criminal antecedent.
3. The modification application is dismissed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-
U T
Checking your session…