Patna High Court

SHIVLAL MARANDIversusThe State of Bihar

Decided: 1 May 2026
Disposal: WITHDRAWN
Bench: SATYAVRAT VERMA

Holding

The court held that the petitioner may withdraw the modification application and it was dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Shivlal Marandi filed a petition in the Patna High Court seeking relief in a criminal miscellaneous matter arising from a case registered at Tikapatti Police Station, Purnia. The petitioner later moved the court for permission to withdraw his application for modification of the proceedings. The learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the withdrawal was necessary and requested the court's leave to do so. The court, after hearing both parties, granted the petitioner's request to withdraw the modification application. Consequently, the modification application was dismissed as withdrawn, and no further orders were made.

Issues considered

Whether the petitioner is entitled to withdraw the modification application filed in the criminal miscellaneous proceeding?

Subjects

withdrawal of application
modification application
criminal miscellaneous proceedings
court procedure

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.28801 of 2026
                                               In
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1757 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-158 Year-2025 Thana- TIKAPATTI District- Purnia
                  ======================================================
                  SHIVLAL MARANDI S/o- Shyam Marandi R/v- Teldiha Santhal Tola Ps-
                  Tikapatti Dist- Purnia

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Vijay Kumar Vimal, Advocate
                  For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    01-05-2026                     1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                    2. The learned counsel for the petitioner, after some

                    arguments, seeks permission to withdraw the modification

                    application.

                                    3. Permission is accorded.

                                    4. Accordingly, the modification application is

                    dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                       (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-

U      T

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…