Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Prabhakar SharmaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to bond and surety conditions.

Summary

Petitioner Prabhakar Sharma applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Khaira PS No.253 of 2025) alleging assault on an informant with an iron rod. The FIR lists multiple offences under the B.N.S, 2023, but counsel argued the incident stemmed from a domestic dispute between relatives, resulting only in simple injuries and that the petitioner has no prior criminal record. The State opposed the bail. Considering the domestic context, the nature of injuries, and the absence of antecedents, the Court granted anticipatory bail, directing the petitioner to surrender within four weeks, furnish a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, and comply with conditions under Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the B.N.S, 2023.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted in a case involving alleged assault under multiple sections of the B.N.S, 2023.
  • Whether the domestic dispute context and nature of injuries justify the grant of anticipatory bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • domestic dispute
  • assault
  • simple injuries
  • bail bond
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • B.N.S

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2958 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-253 Year-2025 Thana- KHAIRA District- Jamui
                 ======================================================
                 Prabhakar Sharma Son of Dilip Sharma R/o Village - Khaira, P.S. - Khaira,
                 Dist. - Jamui.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Brajesh Sahay, Advocate
                                                  Ms. Pushpa Sinha, Advocate
                                                  Mr.Umesh Prasad, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr.Humayou Ahmad Khan
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   28-01-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                  2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection

                   with Khaira P.S. Case no.253 of 2025 registered under section

                   126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 352, 351(2), 303(2), 74 and 3(5)

                   of B.N.S, 2023.

                                 3. Allegations in the F.I.R is that petitioner entered

                   into the shop of the informant armed with an iron rod and

                   assaulted the informant.

                                 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits at the

                   outset that the petitioner and the informant are relatives and it

                   would be apparent from the F.I.R itself that the petitioner had

                   engaged in assault on account of some domestic dispute as such
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2958 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026
                                                        2/2




                      offence under Section 109 of B.N.S would not be attracted.

                      There is case and counter case. Learned counsel referring to the

                      bail rejection order submits that injuries are simple in nature

                      caused by hard and blunt object. The petitioner has no criminal

                      antecedent and undertakes to co-operate in case/trial.

                                   5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by

                      learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                   6. Taking into consideration the aforesaid facts and

                      circumstances of the case and also considering that occurrence

                      took place on some domestic dispute resulting in simple injuries

                      in the background of case and counter case, it is directed that the

                      petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender

                      before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks,

                      be released on anticipatory bail in connection with Khaira P.S.

                      Case no.253 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-

                      (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

                      each to the satisfaction of the learned Court concerned where

                      the case is pending/successor Court, subject to the condition laid

                      down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal

                      Procedure/Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S, 2023.


                                                (Soni Shrivastava, J)
Harsh/-
U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.