Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Niranjan Kumar YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner subject to a Rs 10,000 bond, two sureties, and conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023.

Summary

The petitioner, Niranjan Kumar Yadav, was implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 for allegedly possessing 18 litres of country‑made liquor recovered from two motorcyclists, the motorcycle being registered in his name but reportedly stolen. He claimed he was not present at the time of recovery, had no prior criminal record, and had not previously applied for bail. The State opposed the bail application. The High Court, considering the stolen‑vehicle claim and the modest quantity of contraband, granted bail on the condition that the petitioner furnish a Rs 10,000 bond with two sureties and comply with conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023, including disclosure of any concealed antecedents. The order directed the lower court to cancel bail if false statements were discovered.

Issues considered

  • The appropriateness of granting bail to an accused under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.
  • Whether the fact that the alleged contraband was found on a stolen motorcycle belonging to the petitioner affects bail eligibility.
  • Impact of the petitioner’s claim of no prior criminal antecedents and lack of earlier bail applications on the bail decision.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • contraband
  • stolen vehicle
  • criminal antecedents
  • Section 482
  • high court order

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29596 of 2026
                       Arising Out of PS. Case No.-116 Year-2025 Thana- HARPUR District- Munger
                 ======================================================
                 Niranjan Kumar Yadav, S/o Haridwar Yadav, Resident of Village- Vadla
                 (Badla), P.S.- Velhar (Belhar), Dist.- Banka.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner      :        Mr. Surya Narayan Sah, Advocate
                 For the State           :        Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   06-05-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail, apprehending his arrest,

                   in connection with         Harpur P.S. Case No.116 of 2025, dated-

                   28.12.2025, registered for the offences punishable under

                   Sections 30(a)/ 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise

                   (Amendment) Act, 2022.

                                3. As per allegation, 18 liter of country made liquor

                   has been recovered from two motorcyclist riding motorcycle

                   and as per the further case of the production, the motorcycle

                   belongs to the Petitioner.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   Petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this

                   case. He further submits that even as per the FIR, the Petitioner
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29596 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026
                                            2/3




          was not present at the time of recovery of the contraband. The

          only allegation against the Petitioner is that the motorcycle in

          question belongs to him. However, the motorcycle of the

          Petitioner was already stolen.

                       5. It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the bail

          petition that the petitioner has not moved this Court earlier

          either for anticipatory bail or regular one in the instant case.

                       6. It has further been stated in paragraph no.3 of the

          bail petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents.

                       7. However, learned APP for the State vehemently

          opposes the prayer of the Petitioner for bail.

                       8. Considering the quantity of the alleged contraband

          and the submission of the Petitioner that his motorcycle was

          already stolen, this petition is allowed, directing the petitioner,

          above-named, to be enlarged on bail, in the event of his arrest

          or surrender before the court below within a period of eight

          weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this

          order, on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /-

          (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

          satisfaction of learned concerned Court below, in connection

          with Harpur P.S. Case No.116 of 2025, subject to the conditions

          as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023 and on
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29596 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026
                                                        3/3




                      the following conditions:

                                   (i) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court

                      below that the petitioner has any criminal antecedents, learned

                      court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after

                      hearing him and getting satisfied that the petitioner has

                      concealed his criminal antecedents despite his knowledge of the

                      same.

                                   (ii) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court

                      below that statement regarding previous bail petition is wrong,

                      learned court below shall cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.



                                                                   (Jitendra Kumar, J.)
Chandan/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.