Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Yugal Kumar @ Jugal Kumar @ Jugan KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court ordered the release of the petitioners on bail, subject to a bond and conditions under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

Summary

The petitioners, five residents of Balipur, sought relief fearing arrest in a police case (Sigori P.S. Case No. 7 of 2026) alleging offences under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes (190, 191(2), 191(3), 117(2), 109, 303(2) and 351(2)). The prosecution alleged that the petitioners assaulted the informant, his father and uncle, causing injuries. The petitioners contended they were falsely implicated, pointing out inconsistencies between the medical injury reports and the alleged knife‑stabbing, and highlighted a counter‑complaint filed by one of them. The State and the informant opposed the bail, emphasizing the seriousness of the offences and the petitioners’ criminal antecedents. After weighing the probability of false implication and the petitioners’ own injuries, the Court granted bail to all petitioners subject to a bond of Rs 10,000 with two sureties and compliance with Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S. and other conditions.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioners are entitled to bail in view of the alleged offences under the B.N.S., 2023.
  • Whether there is a probability of false implication warranting bail.
  • Whether the petitioners are likely to flee or tamper with evidence.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • false implication
  • assault
  • Criminal Procedure Code
  • Bihar Negotiable Statutes
  • Section 482
  • high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29968 of 2026
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-7 Year-2026 Thana- SIGAUDI District- Patna
                 ======================================================
           1.     Yugal Kumar @ Jugal Kumar @ Jugan Kumar S/o Nandu Ram @ Nandu
                  Singh R/Vill - Balipur, P.S. - Bihta, Distt- Patna.
           2.    Chhotu Kumar S/o Nandu Ram @ Nandu Singh R/Vill - Balipur, P.S. -
                 Bihta, Distt- Patna.
           3.    Ankit Kumar S/o Nandu Ram @ Nandu Singh R/Vill - Balipur, P.S. - Bihta,
                 Distt- Patna.
           4.    Chinta Devi W/o Nandu Ram @ Nandu Singh R/Vill - Balipur, P.S. - Bihta,
                 Distt- Patna.
           5.     Nandu Ram @ Nandu Singh S/o Anan Ram @ Anant Singh R/Vill - Balipur,
                  P.S. - Bihta, Distt- Patna.
                                                                       ... ... Petitioners
                                               Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                 ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioners       :      Mr. Ram Jiban Pd Singh, Advocate
                                                  Mr. Bipin Kumar, Advocate
                 For the State             :      Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh, APP
                 For the Informant         :      Mrs. Renu Kumari, Advocate
                                                  Mr. Madhu Prasun, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   06-05-2026                         Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned

                   A.P.P. for the State and the learned counsel for the informant.

                                       2. In the present case, the petitioners are

                   apprehending their arrest in connection with Sigori P.S. Case

                   No. 7 of 2026, dated 07.01.2026, registered for the offences

                   punishable under Sections 190, 191(2), 191(3), 117(2), 109,

                   303(2) and 351(2) of the B.N.S., 2023.

                                       3. As per prosecution case, the petitioners who are

                   neighbours of the informant assaulted the informant, his father
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29968 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026
                                            2/4




          and his uncle causing a number of injuries to them.

                          4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

          the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in

          this case. The only specific allegation is against petitioner no. 1

          for stabbing the father of the informant, but the injury report of

          the father of the informant does not show any knife injury and

          injuries of the father of the informant appears to be quite simple

          and superficial and one of the injuries is lacerated wound over

          left ear of size 5 cm and another injury is swelling over left

          forearm of size 2.5 cm. The allegation against other petitioners

          is general and omnibus for indiscriminate assault with lathi, but

          injury report of the informant shows a cut injury on middle of

          head of size 5 cm x 3 cm x skin, whereas injury over the uncle

          of the informant is again a cut injury on head of size 5 cm x skin

          thick and the injuries of both the persons are stated to be simple

          caused by hard and blunt object. Thus, the injury reports falsify

          the allegation of indiscriminate assault. Learned counsel further

          submits that there is counter version and Sigori P.S. Case No. 8

          of 2026 has been instituted on the basis of written report of

          Chinta Devi, petitioner no. 4, as petitioners themselves received

          a number of injuries which remain unexplained and the

          informant’s side is aggressor. Learned counsel further submits
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29968 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026
                                            3/4




          that the petitioners are having antecedent of one case and they

          are on bail.

                          5. Learned APP as well as learned counsel for the

          informant oppose the submissions made on behalf of the

          petitioners. Learned counsel for the informant submits that the

          petitioners brutally assaulted the informant and his family

          members and the petitioners are also having criminal

          antecedent. Learned counsel further submits that a Complaint

          Case is also pending against petitioner no. 1 which has not been

          mentioned, but at the same time admits that cognizance has

          been taken in this case and summons has been issued.

                          6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances and

          submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the

          counter version and injuries of the petitioners and in this

          background probability of false implication, let the petitioners,

          above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the

          Court concerned within a period of eight weeks from today, be

          released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-

          (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties of the like

          amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1 st

          Class, Danapur (Patna), in connection with Sigori P.S. Case No.

          7 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29968 of 2026(2) dt.06-05-2026
                                                      4/4




                    482(2) of the B.N.S.S. and other following conditions:

                                    (i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the

                    petitioners.

                                    (ii) The petitioners will remain present on each and

                    every date fixed by the Court below, if so required by the

                    learned trial Court.


                                                               (Arun Kumar Jha, J)

Shahnawaz/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.