Patna High Court
Bhushan KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- PARTHA SARTHY
Holding
The court held that the petitioner is entitled to regular bail on furnishing a Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties, subject to specified conditions.
Summary
Bhushan Kumar was arrested in connection with a drug case (Parbatta P.S. Case No. 117 of 2026) where 280 grams of heroin were recovered from his cousin Rabin Kumar. He filed an application for regular bail under section 111 of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and section 21(b) of the NDPS Act, claiming he was falsely implicated and has no prior criminal record. The court considered the allegation in the FIR, his custody since 16‑03‑2026, and his clean antecedent. It ordered that he be released on regular bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions including cooperation with the trial and possible cancellation if an antecedent emerges or he delays the trial. The bail was granted with the discretion to cancel if conditions are breached.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail despite the serious nature of the NDPS charge under section 21(b).
- Whether the petitioner’s claim of false implication and lack of criminal antecedent justify bail.
- What conditions should be imposed on the bail to safeguard the trial process.
Legislation cited
- Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita — s. 111
- Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act — s. 21(b)
Subjects
- regular bail
- NDPS Act
- Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita
- drug offence
- false implication
- criminal procedure
- sureties
- bail conditions
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30441 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-117 Year-2026 Thana- PARBATTA District- Khagaria
======================================================
Bhushan Kumar S/O Late Kantalal Mandal Resident of Village- Parbatta,
ward No. 09, P.S- Parbatta, Distt.- Khagaria (Bihar).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Akash Anand, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Nirala, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
ORAL ORDER
3 01-07-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application
for grant of regular bail in connection with Parbatta P.S.
Case no. 117 of 2026 registered under sections 111 of the
Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and section 21(b) of N.D.P.S.
Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, both the petitioner
and coaccused Rabin Kumar were taken into custody. On
search from the possession of coaccused Rabin Kumar
280 grams of heroin was recovered.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case only
for the reason that he happens to be the cousin (chachera)
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30441 of 2026(3) dt.01-07-2026
2/3
brother of the said Rabin Kumar. From reading of the FIR
itself it would transpire that the alleged recovery is from
possession of the coaccused and not the petitioner. The
petitioner is in custody since 16.3.2026 and has no criminal
antecedent. He undertakes to cooperate in the
investigation/trial.
5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties
and taking into consideration the allegation against the
petitioner in the FIR together with the petitioner being in
custody since 16.3.2026 and specially his not having any
criminal antecedent, the Court directs the petitioner to be
enlarged on bail in connection with Parbatta P.S. Case no. 117
of 2026 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (Rupees Ten
Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of the learned Special Judge (N.D.P.S. Act),
Khagaria on the following conditions:
(i) If it subsequently transpires that the petitioner
has an antecedent, the prosecution will be at liberty to
move this Court for cancellation of bail granted to the
petitioner.
(ii) The petitioner shall remain properly
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30441 of 2026(3) dt.01-07-2026
3/3
represented on each date of the trial in the learned trial
Court and shall cooperate in the trial.
(iv) In case the learned trial Court is of the
opinion that the trial is being delayed due to non-
cooperation on part of the petitioner, the learned trial Court
may cancel the bail bond of the petitioner and take him into
custody till conclusion of the trial.
(Partha Sarthy, J)
Bibhash/Amit
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.