Patna High Court

Ramji Sahni @ LadduversusThe State of Bihar

Decided: 6 May 2026
Disposal: WITHDRAWN
Bench: SATYAVRAT VERMA

Holding

The court allowed the withdrawal of the anticipatory bail application and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

Ramji Sahni was arrested while his anticipatory bail application was pending before the Patna High Court. He approached the court seeking permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application after his arrest. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Rajeev Kumar, argued that the arrest rendered the bail application moot and requested its withdrawal. The court examined the request and, finding no impediment, granted permission to withdraw the application. Consequently, the anticipatory bail petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

Whether an anticipatory bail application can be withdrawn after the petitioner has been arrested

Subjects

anticipatory bail
withdrawal
arrest
Criminal Procedure Code
high court

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30707 of 2026
                        Arising Out of PS. Case No.-63 Year-2026 Thana- KEWATI District- Darbhanga
                  ======================================================
                  Ramji Sahni @ Laddu S/o Bikau Sahni R/o Village - Barhi, Ward No. 1, PS -
                  Keoti, District - Darbhanga, State - Bihar

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                         ... ... Opposite Party/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Rajeev Kumar
                  For the Opposite Party/s :        Ms. Sucheta Yadav
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA
                                        ORAL ORDER

2    06-05-2026                  1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                    learned A.P.P. for the State.

                                 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                    petitioner during pendency of the anticipatory bail application

                    was arrested, thus, seeks permission to withdraw the same.

                                 3. Permission is accorded.

                                 4. Accordingly,         the      instant     anticipatory           bail

                    application is dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                           (Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/-

U      T

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…