Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Shankar Chaurasiya @ Shankar KumarversusThe State Of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
REJECTED

Holding

The court denied bail, holding that the seriousness of the charges, the large quantity of contraband, and the petitioner’s prior criminal record preclude the grant of regular bail.

Summary

The petitioner, Shankar Chaurasiya, sought regular bail in a case involving large quantities of narcotics, a firearm, and illicit liquor, with charges under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, NDPS Act, Arms Act and Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The FIR disclosed recovery of 545 g of smack, 558.90 g of charas, a pistol, and 21.5 L of illicit liquor, and the co‑accused identified the petitioner. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing no incriminating material was found in his possession and that he had been in custody since 13 January 2026. The court noted the seriousness of the offences, the huge quantity of contraband, and the petitioner’s five prior criminal records, two of which were similar. Consequently, the bail application was rejected, and the trial court was directed to expedite the trial within a year.

Issues considered

  • Whether regular bail should be granted to the petitioner despite the nature and quantity of the offences and his criminal antecedents

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • narcotics
  • arms possession
  • illicit liquor
  • criminal antecedents
  • high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30938 of 2026
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-975 Year-2025 Thana- MANER District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Shankar Chaurasiya @ Shankar Kumar S/O Late Bharat Lal @ Bharat Lal
                 Chourasiya R/O - Mira Nagar, P.S- Maner, Dist.- Patna

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :        Mr. Kumar Goutam, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :        Mr. Damodar Prasad Tiwary, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   14-05-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with

                   Maner P. S. Case No. 975 of 2025 registered for the offences

                   punishable under Section 111(2)(a) of the Bharatiya Nyaya

                   Sanhita, Sections 8(c), 18(b), 21(c), 22(kha), 22(Ga), 30, 31 of

                   the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, Sections

                   25(1-B)a, 26, 35 of Arms Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar

                   Prohibition and Excise Act.

                                3. As per F.I.R., 545 gm smack, 558.90 gm Charas,

                   one country made pistol, 21.50 liters illicit liquor was recovered

                   from possession of co-accused persons who disclosed the name

                   of this petitioner. Petitioner has got five criminal antecedents out

                   of which two are of similar nature.
              Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30938 of 2026(2) dt.14-05-2026
                                                          2/2




                                     4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                        petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. No

                        incriminating material has been recovered from conscious

                        possession of the petitioner and he is no way connected with the

                        aforesaid recovery. Petitioner is in custody since 13.01.2026.

                                     5. Considering the nature of accusation, huge quantity

                        of recovery and criminal antecedents, prayer for bail of the

                        petitioner is rejected.

                                     6. However, since petitioner is in custody since

                        13.01.2026, Trial Court is directed to expedite and conclude the

                        trial, preferably, within a period of one year from the date of

                        receipt/production of copy of this order.



                                              (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Navya/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.