Patna High Court
Shivnath PaswanversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR
- Decided
- Disposal
- BAIL GRANTED
- Bench
- CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
Holding
The court held that anticipatory bail is appropriate for the petitioners given the victim’s denial of kidnapping and their clean record.
Summary
Shivnath Paswan and Kalawati Devi, grandparents of the alleged principal accused, were named in an FIR for kidnapping, sexual assault and related offences under the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The informant’s 15‑year‑old daughter, who was allegedly kidnapped, testified that she left her parental home of her own volition and married the grandson, denying any kidnapping or assault. The petitioners, senior citizens with no prior criminal record, sought anticipatory bail. The State opposed the bail. Considering the victim’s denial, the petitioners’ clean antecedent and their peripheral role as grandparents, the court ordered that they be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.
Issues considered
- Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners under Section 438 Cr.P.C. and Section 482 B.N.S.S.
- Whether the allegations of kidnapping and sexual assault stand in view of the victim’s statement denying such acts
- Whether the petitioners’ lack of criminal antecedent warrants bail
Legislation cited
- Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita — s. 482(2)
- Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 — s. 137(2), 303(2), 3(5), 96
- Criminal Procedure Code — s. 438(2)
Subjects
- anticipatory bail
- kidnapping
- sexual assault
- marriage
- clean antecedent
- Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita
- Criminal Procedure Code
- bail conditions
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31008 of 2026
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-445 Year-2025 Thana- GHORASAHAN District- East
Champaran
======================================================
1. Shivnath Paswan S/o Late Dularchand Paswan Both Resident of Village -
Ghorasahan PS. - Ghorasahan, Dist. - East Champaran.
2. Kalawati Devi @ Sanmati Devi W/o Shivnath Paswan Both Resident of
Village - Ghorasahan PS. - Ghorasahan, Dist. - East Champaran.
... ... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Manoj Kumar, Advocate
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sharda Kumari, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
ORAL ORDER
2 13-05-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned
APP for the State.
2. The accused-petitioners, named in the F.I.R., are
apprehending their arrest in connection with Ghorasahan P.S.
Case No. 445 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable
under Sections 137(2), 96, 303(2), 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyay
Sanhita, 2023 (in short, the ‘B.N.S.’).
3. As per FIR, the grand-son of petitioner alleged to
kidnapped the minor daughter of the informant aged about 15
years for the purpose of illicit intercourse/marriage with another
person.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner
submitted that in fact the daughter of the informant was in love
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31008 of 2026(2) dt.13-05-2026
2/3
with the grand-son of petitioner and when their love affairs was
not approved by the informant and his family members, the
daughter of the informant left her parental home out of her own
will and solemnized marriage with the grand-son of the
petitioner.
5. It is submitted that the victim has herself supported
this factual aspect while recording her statement under section
183 of the B.N.S.S., where she categorically challenged the
allegation of sexual assault and kidnapping. Arguing further,
petitioners implicated only for the reason that they are the
grand-parents of the main co-accused with whom the daughter
of the informant alleged to solemnize marriage. Both petitioners
are senior citizens having clean antecedent.
6. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer of
anticipatory bail of the petitioners.
7. In view of the aforesaid factual submissions and by
taking note of the fact as petitioners are the grand-parents of the
main co-accused, where victim, after recovery, appears denied
the allegation of kidnapping and sexual assault, coupled with the
fact that petitioners have no criminal antecedent, accordingly,
both above-named petitioners, in the event of their
arrest/surrender within a period of four weeks from this order,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31008 of 2026(2) dt.13-05-2026
3/3
are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing of bail bond of
Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two sureties of the
like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief
Judicial Magistrate, Sikarhana, Dhaka, East Champaran/
concerned court in connection with Ghorasahan P.S. Case No.
445 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under
Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C/Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya
Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (in short “B.N.S.S.”).
(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
Rajeev/-
U T
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.