Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023

33 judgments · newest first · showing 1–33

ATHARV PRADIP MANEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

Dismissed as Withdrawn

Atharv Pradip Mane applied for anticipatory bail in Criminal Case No. 1216 of 2025 for alleged offences under sections 311, 313 read with clause 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The applicant sought pre‑arrest release on such terms as the court might deem fit. During the hearing, the …

KUNAL VINOD SAUDEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The applicant, Kunal Vinod Saude, aged 21, sought enlargement of bail in a case (C.R. No. 450/2025) concerning the death of a young man on 7 October 2025. The prosecution alleged that the applicant, along with three co‑accused, was involved in offences punishable under Sections 103 and 3(5) of the …

YOGESH SHARAD KADAMversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application under Section 439 of the CrPC (and the analogous provision in the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita) filed by Yogesh Sharad Kadam, the managing director of Season Worlds, who was charged with cheating offences under IPC sections 420, 406, 409 read …

ARTIJ W/O VINAYAK GUPTEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court considered a bail application under Section 439 of the CrPC (and the analogous provision in the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita) filed by Yogesh Sharad Kadam, the managing director of Season Worlds, who was charged with cheating offences under IPC sections 420, 406, 409 read …

VIRABHAI AMARABHAI CHOPDAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Virabhai Amarabhai Chopda was arrested on 26-07-2026 in connection with FIR CR No.11186009260720 alleging offences under the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023, including unlawful assembly and conspiracy. He filed an application for regular bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, …

MOHAMMEDHASAN KHANUBHAI QURESHIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The High Court of Gujarat entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, filed by Mohammedhasan Khanubhai Qureshi and another in connection with FIR No.11191011260083 alleging offences under Sections 316(2), 316(5) and 54 of the …

FARUKHBHAI HISAMUDDIN VAZIFDARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The petitioners Farukhbai Hisamuddin Vazifdar & Anr. applied for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with an FIR alleging offences under Sections 316(2), 316(5) and 55 of the BNSS (corresponding to IPC 406, 409 and 34) and a related …

VOHRA MAHAMMAD SAHID ANVARBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

The applicant, Vohra Mahammad Sahid Anvarbhai, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with FIR CR No.11204027240524 of 2024 alleging an offence under Section 316(2) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution …

JAYDEEP RANJITAJI THAKORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

56-DISPOSED AT ADMISSION STAGE

The petitioner filed a special criminal application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Surksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quashing of FIR I.CR.No. 11206020241182/2024 registered at Kadi Police Station, Mehsana, for offences under Sections 87 and 137(2) of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023. The …

AJAYBHAI HAMIRBHAI CHAUHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

58-RULE ISSUED & RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @FH

The High Court of Gujarat considered an application under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, filed by Ajaybhai Hamirbai Chauhan seeking regular bail after a charge‑sheet had been filed for offences under the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 and the Protection of Children from …

ARJUN S/O SANTOSH DIVARE THROUGH HIS MOTHER REKHA SANTOSH DIVAREversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Arjun, detained as a "dangerous person" under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985, challenged the preventive detention order dated 10‑01‑2026. The petitioner argued that no material was placed before the authority to show that his conduct disturbed public order, and that the …

KAIF @ KALLU S/O SAMIRULLA ANSARI THROUGH ANSARI MOHAMAD SAHAJADversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Kaif @ Kallu was preventively detained on 30-12-2025 as a ‘dangerous person’ under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. The detainee, through his brother, challenged the order alleging no material showed any disturbance to public order and that the order was …

BALVANTBHAI S/O RATNABHAI @RATNBHAI SANGADAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Balvantbhai was preventively detained on 27 December 2025 as a ‘dangerous person’ under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the order, arguing that no material showed any disturbance to public order and that the detention was mechanical. The …

HIMMATSINH KARANSINH VANZARA THROUGH VANZARA KANUBHAI KALUBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Himmatsinh Karansinh Vanzara was preventively detained on 31‑12‑2025 by the District Magistrate, Porbandar, under Section 2(b) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a ‘bootlegger’. His father filed a special criminal application challenging the order, arguing that no …

SURENDRASINH LAXMANSINH BHATI THRO JIVRAJSINH MANGUSINH SHEKHAVATversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Surendrasinh Laxmansinh Bhati was detained on 25‑12‑2025 under Section 2(b) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "bootlegger". He challenged the detention through a petition filed by his next friend. The petitioner argued that no material was placed before the detaining …

KHUSHALBHAI SAVJIBHAI MANIYA THRO PIYUSHBHAI SAVJIBHAI MANIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Khushalbhai Savjibhai Maniya was preventively detained on 31‑12‑2025 under Section 2(b) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "bootlegger". He challenged the detention through a petition filed by his brother. The State argued that his habitual bootlegging threatened …

JIGNESHBHAI SAVJIBHAI MANIYA THRO PIYUSHBHAI SAVJIBHAI MANIYAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Jigneshbhai Savjibhai Maniya was preventively detained on 31‑12‑2025 under Section 2(b) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "bootlegger". He challenged the detention through a petition filed by his brother, arguing that no material showed any disturbance to public …

JILANBHAI BIPINBHAI PAREKH THRO BIPINBHAI S/O JAMNADAS PAREKHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Jilanbhai Bipinbhai Parekh was preventively detained on 31‑12‑2025 under Section 2(b) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a "bootlegger". He challenged the detention through a petition filed by his father, arguing that no material showed any disturbance to public health, …

PIRU SAID SHAIKH THROUGH NAJAMABI FIROZBHAI SHAIKHversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Piru Said Shaikh was preventively detained on 29 November 2025 by the Surat Police Commissioner as a "dangerous person" under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. The detainee, through his mother‑in‑law, challenged the detention order, arguing that no material …

NOORJAHA W/O KHALID TEKA THRO UMER FARUQ AHMEDHUSEN HAYATversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Noorjaha, detained under a preventive detention order dated 22‑12‑2025 pursuant to Section 2(bbb) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a ‘cruel person’, challenged the order through a petition filed by her brother. The petitioner argued that no material was placed before …

DINESHKUMAR S/O HEMARAM BISHNOI THRO KRISHAN S/O SURESH SHARMAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Dineshkumar, detained as a "bootlegger" under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985, challenged the preventive detention order dated 18‑12‑2025. He argued that the detaining authority had no material showing his activities disturbed public health, order or tranquility, and that …

LIKHAMA RAM S/O PRABHURAM JAT THRO KRISHAN S/O SURESH SHARMAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Likhama Ram, a bootlegger, was preventively detained on 18‑12‑2025 by the Ahmedabad Police Commissioner under Section 2(b) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the detention through a petition, arguing that no material showed his activities disturbed public …

RAKESH S/O. VASUDEV BHIL (KUVAR) THRO GAJENDRA LOTASING JADHAVversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Rakesh was preventively detained on 28‑11‑2025 as a “sexual offender” under Section 2(ha) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the order, arguing that no material showed any disturbance to public order and that the detention was mechanical. The State contended …

SACHIN @ SALANG DAHYABHAI PARMAR THRO DINKALSACHINBHAI PARMARversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Sachin @ Salang Dahyabhai Parmar was preventively detained on 21‑12‑2025 under Section 2(b) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a bootlegger. He challenged the detention through a petition filed by his wife, arguing that no material showed his activities disturbed public …

SAMPAT MOHANLAL DHOBI THRO KOMAL KUNAL DHOBIversusPOLICE COMMISSIONER

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Sampat Mohanlal Dhobi was preventively detained on 12‑12‑2025 by the Police Commissioner of Ahmedabad under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985 as a ‘dangerous person’. The detainee, through his sister, challenged the order, arguing that no material was placed …

TWINKLE S/O JAGMOHAN SHARMAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Twinkle was preventively detained on 20‑12‑2025 as a ‘dangerous person’ under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985. He challenged the order, arguing that no material showed any disturbance to public order and that the order was passed mechanically. The State …

ADNAN @R.C. S/O HURODDIN SHEKH THRO SHAIKH SAMIR HURODDINversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

38-RULE ABSOLUTE/ALLOWED @ FH

Adnan @R.C., detained as a "dangerous person" under Section 2(c) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑social Activities Act, 1985, challenged the preventive detention order dated 17‑12‑2025. The petitioner argued that no material showed any disturbance to public order and that the order was passed …